Can physics explain the phenomenon of fire-walking?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikex24
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of fire-walking, exploring whether it can be explained through physics. Participants examine the principles behind fire-walking, including thermal conductivity and the mechanics of walking on hot coals, as well as related activities like glass walking and fire eating.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that fire-walking can be explained by physics, citing factors such as the low thermal conductivity of coals, minimizing contact time, and reducing the contact area of the feet.
  • Others argue that the presence of ash on the coals provides insulation and that perspiration from the feet contributes to safety.
  • A participant mentions the Leidenfrost effect as a principle that makes fire-related performances safe.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of fire-walking and similar activities, with some participants emphasizing that they should not be attempted without proper training.
  • Discussion includes comparisons to other activities like glass walking and lying on a bed of nails, noting that these also involve principles of pressure distribution and thermal conductivity.
  • A participant references a Mythbusters episode that supports the idea that walking casually on coals is crucial to avoid burns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the safety and feasibility of fire-walking, with some asserting it is safe if done correctly, while others caution against its risks. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall safety and the necessity of training for such activities.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying personal experiences with fire-walking and related activities, as well as differing opinions on safety and the need for training. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the broader implications of these activities and their underlying physics.

mikex24
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hello. I read in a book about fire-walkers and that the fire walking (walking without shoes on burnt coals) it has relationship with physics effects and that it can be explained by physics (something with temperatures). Does anyone knows anything about this ? Cheers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nothing?
 
Yes it's true, fire walking is not magic and it's not mind over matter either. The physics relates to :

(1) Low thermal conductivity of the rocks.
(2) Walk so as to minimize the time spent in contact with the rocks.
(3) Keep the contact area with the feet as small as possible.
 
but why it is so hard to do it?
 
I'm not sure who told you it was hard to do, but it is very easy to do. The burnt coals have a layer of ash on them, which helps to insulate your feet. Plus our feet perspire slightly, which also helps.

NO ONE SHOULD TRY THIS AT HOME.
 
hypatia said:
NO ONE SHOULD TRY THIS AT HOME.

Why not? It's perfectly safe if done properly.
 
ideasrule said:
Why not? It's perfectly safe if done properly.
Heed Hypatia. It is PF policy to NEVER suggest activities are perfectly safe if there's potential for harm. It's a liability thing, not to mention an ethical thing.
 
Shouldn't PF have some sort of natural selection clause, as to if someone is dumb enough to get hurt doing something stupid, they deserve it?

Anyways, What about glass walking? How does that work out?
 
  • #10
I think this become an episode in myth busters, an it does have some physics to it. the host of the program tried it for them selves and did not get burned.
what the host of the program explained is that you can't get hurt from doing it as long as your feet doesn't stay too long on the flame. its the same as the bed of nails its just looks hard to do but the host of the show tried it for them selves and they were ok.
 
  • #11
Natural Selection Clause! That gets my Vote. :biggrin: very funny.
 
  • #12
MotoH said:
Shouldn't PF have some sort of natural selection clause, as to if someone is dumb enough to get hurt doing something stupid, they deserve it?

Anyways, What about glass walking? How does that work out?

Speaking as one who's cosmology teacher in high school was... a different sort... I've walked on glass, and it's really not that fancy. You feel and smooth the way in front of you, so that no sharp points are there to puncture, and then you distribute your weight from the outer portion of the foot, inward. It's easy, and it hurts, and you can be cut. No magic, just like eating fire.

It's the same as laying on a bed of nails, which I did... IN THE SAME CLASS. Ahh it was a different time. The trick is that there is no trick: Ash is a poor thermal conductor, your feet spend little time on coals, eating fire involves holding the torth so that the heat RISES and then rapidly snuffing the flame with your mouth.

Glass, Nails, etc... all are about the elasticity and strength of human skin, and distribution of pressure.

NOTE: If you are overweight, you can be badly hurt walking on glass. If your weight is normal, and you get unlucky, you can be hurt.

IF you slip and fall, you could end up with a shard of glass in your femoral artery, or more commonly the radial artery as a result of trying to break one's fall. People who hammer nails into their sinuses, just deal with the pain.

I suppose there is a trick, and that is: Most sane people wouldn't attempt these stunts, so they have no personal reference beyond "nails and glass are sharp, and those coals look HOT!"
 
  • #13
Hi all it's my first post to this forum. though I've lurked here a while. I happen to be a fire performer and in my act I do fire eating, fire walking, flame transfers (using body parts to hold open flames) as well as stick my hand into molten lead. it's all real and it's just physics. The principal that makes most fire work safe is the Liendenfrost effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leidenfrost_effect"


oh and don't try any of this without training...I shouldn't have to say that but...

oh and if you want to learn more about fire eating, poison eating, glass walking and a list of other really amazing sideshow feats and how they are performed...
Houdini's own expose...
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/435/435-h/435-h.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
Mythbusters did do this one once. They found 2 things. First that ash is a poor thermal conductor as mentioned. The other important this you have to have to walk casually. If you walk fast you might pinch some coals in your toes or dig into the coals which results in burns from longer contact times with the heat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K