I Can Placing Earth Between 3 Black Holes Slow Down Time?

Joe Bond
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
I am just wondering if placing the Earth equidistant from 3 black holes that are spinnng would slow down time on the Earth, due to the time dilation effect. Would that give us more time to live?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you need three? Being in orbit around one would do. And it only slows down the passage of time relative to observers far away from the black hole. For the inhabitants of Earth time would seem to pass normally. Nobody would have gained any extra time to watch Netflix before they died.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Dale and Joe Bond
Joe Bond said:
I am just wondering if placing the Earth equidistant from 3 black holes that are spinnng would slow down time on the Earth, due to the time dilation effect. Would that give us more time to live?
Assuming of course we aren't past the event horizon yet we are relatively close
 
Bandersnatch said:
Why do you need three? Being in orbit around one would do. And it only slows down the passage of time relative to observers far away from the black hole. For the inhabitants of Earth time would seem to pass normally. Nobody would have gained any extra time to watch Netflix before they died.
oh I see, that's sad. Thank you for your reply
 
Joe Bond said:
oh I see, that's sad. Thank you for your reply
Time dilation isn't something that you directly experience. Instead, the special and general theories of relativity entail something called differential ageing. This means that if you go and spend some time close to a black hole and then return, you may well be significant younger than someone who stayed at home. The reason for this is that you have taken a shorter path through spacetime. The length of your path through spacetime is precisely the amount of proper time that has elapsed for you. Proper time is what you experience.

So, although when you return you may be younger than the friends you left behind, you have literally experienced less time. In that sense you can't directly get the best of both worlds by ageing less yet experiencing the same amount of time to enjoy life. You need herbal remedies for that!
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and Joe Bond
PeroK said:
Time dilation isn't something that you directly experience. Instead, the special and general theories of relativity entail something called differential ageing. This means that if you go and spend some time close to a black hole and then return, you may well be significant younger than someone who stayed at home. The reason for this is that you have taken a shorter path through spacetime. The length of your path through spacetime is precisely the amount of proper time that has elapsed for you. Proper time is what you experience.

So, although when you return you may be younger than the friends you left behind, you have literally experienced less time. In that sense you can't directly get the best of both worlds by ageing less yet experiencing the same amount of time to enjoy life. You need herbal remedies for that!
thank you for your reply
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top