Can Quantum Entanglement Be Blocked

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum entanglement, specifically whether it can be blocked or shielded, and the implications of entanglement over distances. Participants explore the nature of entanglement, its measurement, and its potential applications in communication technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that quantum entanglement can be affected by measuring one of the entangled particles, while others clarify that there is no physical connection between the particles that could be shielded.
  • A participant questions the feasibility of being a target for entanglement, suggesting that humans cannot be entangled due to decoherence.
  • There is a discussion about the distance over which entanglement can be maintained, with references to specific experiments confirming entanglement over distances greater than 89 miles.
  • Some participants argue that quantum entanglement cannot be used alone to carry information, but can enhance security in traditional communication methods.
  • There is a request for sources regarding claims made about quantum entanglement and its applications, highlighting the importance of credible references.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of quantum entanglement, its measurement, and its applications. There is no consensus on whether entanglement can be shielded or blocked, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of its use in communication technologies.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarification on the definitions of terms used, the conditions under which entanglement is maintained, and the specific contexts of the experiments referenced. There are unresolved questions about the reliability of sources cited in the discussion.

coljohnhannibal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello,

It's my understanding that the US can control Quantum Entanglement up to a distance of 89 miles. Can this be shielded against, like EMF can be shielded against; and what materials are necessary?

Thanks, John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can destroy entanglement by measuring one of the entangled objects (or just remove the setup that carefully preserves entanglement, and the environment will do that over time), but you cannot put anything "in between" because there is no physical connection between (in terms of space) those particles.
 
Is there a clever way to do your first suggestion, with myself as the target?

Thanks, John
 
coljohnhannibal said:
It's my understanding that the US can control Quantum Entanglement up to a distance of 89 miles.

Where did you hear this? Either your source is bogus or you have misunderstood what they're saying, but it's impossible to know which unless we know what it is.

This thread will be closed unless you can tell us more about where you heard this.
 
Here's the information you asked for:

(Free space entanglement of photons has been confirmed in experiments between the Canary Islands of La Palma and Tenerife, a distance of 143 km. See Herbst et al 2014, in the Other Internet Resources.) 143km = 89 miles.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-entangle/

11th paragraph.

Thanks, John
 
coljohnhannibal said:
Is there a clever way to do your first suggestion, with myself as the target?

You can't be the target. You are a decoherent system that cannot be entangled with another system. The experiment you are referring to entangled 2 photons, not people.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
coljohnhannibal said:

Got it - thanks. There's much less here than it sounds like...
It's my understanding that the US can control Quantum Entanglement up to a distance of 89 miles.

No one, not the US or anyone else, is controlling the entanglement. When an entangled pair is created, they stay entangled until either member of the pair interacts with anything else. What these scientists have done is allowed the photons to separate by 89 miles before either one hits something. There's nothing to shield.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello,

Can a large stream of photons be entangled and used to carry information, such as television and radio messages are now. I read several years ago that this was done in Switzerland with a bank transaction and that the technique used was referred to as Quantum Teleportation.

Thanks, John
 
coljohnhannibal said:
Can a large stream of photons be entangled and used to carry information, such as television and radio messages are now.
Quantum entanglement alone cannot be used to carry information. It can be used in conjunction with traditional communication technologies to improve the security of information carried on traditional ways.

I read several years ago that this was done in Switzerland with a bank transaction and that the technique used was referred to as Quantum Teleportation.
You're doing it again! Where did you read this?
 
  • #10
Nugatory said:
You're doing it again! Where did you read this?
I guess he's referring to the quantum cryptography link under lake Geneva:
http://www.unige.ch/gap/qtech/_media/publications:bib:muller95.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
DrClaude said:
I guess he's referring to the quantum cryptography link under lake Geneva:
http://www.unige.ch/gap/qtech/_media/publications:bib:muller95.pdf

Yep, that was my guess as well... But it would still be good to know exactly which article, as some of the popular press articles are slightly less appalling better than others.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Hello,

More than likely this was an article in Popular Science, or Popular Mechanics; however this was so long ago I can't be sure.

Thanks, John
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
417
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 276 ·
10
Replies
276
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K