MHB Can Series Expansion Prove the Relation Between Inverse Coth and ln(x+1)/(x-1)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the inverse hyperbolic cotangent function and the natural logarithm using series expansion, specifically showing that \( \frac{1}{2} \ln \frac{x+1}{x-1} = \text{arcoth}(x) \). Participants confirm that the series expansion for the left-hand side yields \( x + \frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^5}{5} + \ldots \), while also noting that the series for \( \text{arcoth}(x) \) is singular at \( x = 0 \). The consensus is that while series expansion can be applied, it is not necessary for this proof, as a direct algebraic manipulation suffices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse hyperbolic functions, specifically \( \text{arcoth}(x) \).
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their applications in function expansion.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties and their relationships to hyperbolic functions.
  • Basic calculus skills, including differentiation and series convergence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Taylor series for \( \text{arcoth}(x) \) and \( \text{tanh}^{-1}(x) \).
  • Explore the properties of hyperbolic functions and their inverses in greater detail.
  • Investigate the singularities of hyperbolic functions and their implications in series expansion.
  • Learn about alternative proofs for hyperbolic identities without relying on series expansion.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus and hyperbolic functions, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical proofs involving series expansions and logarithmic identities.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi - my sometimes surprising set-book asks to show by series expansion, that $ \frac{1}{2}ln\frac{x+1}{x-1} =coth^{-1} (x) $

I get LHS = $ x+\frac{{x}^{3}}{3}+\frac{{x}^{5}}{5}+... $, which I think $= tanh^{-1} $ but I have found different expansions for the hyperbolic inverses, so I'd appreciate confirmation (or not) please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ognik said:
Hi - my sometimes surprising set-book asks to show by series expansion, that $ \frac{1}{2}ln\frac{x+1}{x-1} =coth^{-1} (x) $

I get LHS = $ x+\frac{{x}^{3}}{3}+\frac{{x}^{5}}{5}+... $, which I think $= tanh^{-1} $ but I have found different expansions for the hyperbolic inverses, so I'd appreciate confirmation (or not) please?

You shouldn't need to use series to prove this:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y &= \textrm{arcoth}\,{(x)} \\ \textrm{coth}\,{(y)} &= x \\ \frac{\cosh{(y)}}{\sinh{(y)}} &= x \\ \frac{\frac{1}{2}\,\left( \mathrm{e}^{y} + \mathrm{e}^{-y} \right) }{\frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{e}^y - \mathrm{e}^{-y} \right) } &= x \\ \frac{\mathrm{e}^y + \mathrm{e}^{-y}}{\mathrm{e}^y - \mathrm{e}^{-y}} &= x \\ \mathrm{e}^y + \mathrm{e}^{-y} &= x \, \left( \mathrm{e}^y - \mathrm{e}^{-y} \right) \\ \mathrm{e}^y + \mathrm{e}^{-y} &= x\,\mathrm{e}^y - x\,\mathrm{e}^{-y} \\ \mathrm{e}^y \,\left( \mathrm{e}^y + \mathrm{e}^{-y} \right) &= \mathrm{e}^y\,\left( x\,\mathrm{e}^y - x\,\mathrm{e}^{-y} \right) \\ \left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 + 1 &= x\,\left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 - x \\ 1 + x &= x\,\left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 - \left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 \\ 1 + x &= \left( x - 1 \right) \,\left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 \\ \frac{x + 1}{x - 1 } &= \left( \mathrm{e}^y \right) ^2 \\ \left( \frac{x + 1}{x - 1} \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}} &= \mathrm{e}^y \\ \ln{ \left[ \left( \frac{x + 1}{x - 1} \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}} \right] } &= y \\ y &= \frac{1}{2} \ln{ \left( \frac{x + 1}{x - 1} \right) } \end{align*}$

Thus $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arcoth}\,{(x)} = \frac{1}{2} \ln{ \left( \frac{x+1}{x -1} \right) } \end{align*}$.
 
Prove It said:
You shouldn't need to use series to prove this:
As you have ably demonstrated :-), but its in a section on series, so we do what we must.

Is it possible that the series for both $$coth^{-1}$$ and $$Tanh^{-1}$$ are the same?

I start from $\d{coth^{-1}}{x}-\frac{1}{1-x^2}$

But I don't get the same series for $coth^{-1}$, my 1st problem is that my first term in the series should be f(0) but my calculator says $\frac{1}{Tanh^{-1}(0)} = 0$, so $coth^{-1}$ is singular?

My 2nd term f'''(0), I get $x^3$ instead of $\frac{x^3}{3}$ - so I think I'm doing something wrong...
 
Last edited:
To summarize what I'm asking:

I think the 1st term of the taylor series for arc coth x is singular, so I can't find a series. Wolfram seems to agree.

If I ignore the 1st term (but cannot justify that), I get something similar to the LHS series I got - but really, I'm just fiddling.

How else can I use series expansion to prove the relation?
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K