Can shear be ignored in a situation like this

  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of shear stress in a round beam fixed at two rigid holes, with a length between 1m and 2m and a diameter of less than 2 cm. It concludes that while shear stress can often be ignored in bending calculations, it is essential to consider the beam as a whole when calculating deflection. The participants agree that for accurate deflection analysis, the beam must not be split into sections, as this would overlook critical factors such as the angle at the supports. Resources such as Engineers Edge provide useful formulas for beam bending and deflection calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam mechanics and bending stress
  • Knowledge of shear stress and its implications in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with deflection calculations for beams
  • Access to resources like Engineers Edge for beam analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Beam Deflection Calculations" using resources like Engineers Edge
  • Study "Bending Moment Diagrams" for various beam configurations
  • Explore "Shear Force and Bending Moment Relationships" in structural engineering
  • Learn about "Cantilever Beam Analysis" for different loading conditions
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students studying beam mechanics who need to understand the implications of shear stress and deflection in beam analysis.

wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2
The situation I am looking at involves a round beam that goes through two rigid round holes (top beam in the image). The holes are meant to fix the beam. The beam length is between 1m and 2m and the diameter is less than 2 cm. If the beam was attached at the end with only one holes fixing it I would ignore the shear stress but in this case I am concerned about the region in between the two supporting holes. Is it ok to ignore shear stress in the beam?
When doing bending calculations would it be a bad approximation if I were to separate the beam as shown in the bottom part of the image?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 579
  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 573
Engineering news on Phys.org
In beams shear usually has to be taken into account when two opposite forces are close. In my opinion this is not the case, at least if the lengths of the beam at both sides are similar. To be sure it is best to make the calculations with the actual forces, dimensions and materials, but I'd say the shear stresses will be small compared to the flexural stress at the section with higher bending moment.
As the bending moment at the supports is the same, it is OK to consider just the separated beams, as we know the forces at the tips and we also know the highest bending moment has to be at either support. But if we had to calculate the deflection of course we should consider the problem as it is: a single beam with two supports and two loads, calculate the forces at the supports and so on.
 
Thankyou for answering. I was thinking it would be ok to ignore shear but I just wanted someone elses opinion on the matter.
You said that to do deflections I would have to analyze the beam as a whole. But what if I only wanted to find the deflection for the ends of the beam where the forces are applied. Would it still be alright to split the beam into two sections?
 
No, it wouldn't. In order to evaluate the deflection the beam has to be considered as a whole. Think about the angle of the beam at the supports. In the original problem the beam will cross the supports at an angle (albeit small), but if we consider a cantilever beam the angle at the fixed end is supposed to be zero.
You can see http://www.me.berkeley.edu/~lwlin/me128/BeamDeflection.pdf.
You can save yourself all the differential equations and look for formulas for each specific case. This seems a nice resource:
http://www.engineersedge.com/beam_calc_menu.shtml
Your original case is at:
http://www.engineersedge.com/beam_bending/beam_bending4.htm
The cantilevered beam with one load at the end is at:
http://www.engineersedge.com/beam_bending/beam_bending9.htm
 
Sorry about the late reply I got caught up in something. Thank you for helping me out. The links you gave solved my problem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K