Can someone explain Euclid's Algorithm to me?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm Explain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Euclid's Algorithm, particularly in the context of a confusing example presented in a textbook. Participants express frustration with the clarity of the material and seek clarification on the algorithm's workings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant criticizes their textbook for providing a confusing explanation and asserts that the statements made about Euclid's Algorithm are incorrect.
  • Another participant suggests rotating the scan of the textbook to better understand the explanation provided.
  • A different participant expresses frustration over a specific mathematical statement from the book, questioning its validity and coherence.
  • One participant reiterates their confusion about the algorithm and the statements made in the textbook, emphasizing their dissatisfaction with the material.
  • A later reply proposes that "1.106" refers to "1 times 106," which seems to clarify some confusion for another participant.
  • One participant expresses relief at the clarification, indicating they no longer feel the need to change their academic focus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement regarding the clarity and correctness of the textbook's explanation of Euclid's Algorithm. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain, particularly concerning the mathematical statements presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential notational confusion and the possibility of typos in the textbook, which may contribute to their misunderstandings. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

Who May Find This Useful

Students struggling with Euclid's Algorithm or those seeking clarification on mathematical notation and textbook explanations may find this discussion relevant.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
My book is utterly useless - it vaguely gives me a history behind it, its motivations, and then lists an example in which it precedes to write a bunch of utterly false statements and then just.. spits out the answer.

Can someone explain to me what on Earth is going on in the attached picture? If this is not a notational confusion or typos in my book, then I must assert that Euclid's Algorithm makes absolutely no sense. 212 = 106.2, therefore here you go. I demand the author be sent to the lunatic asylum immediately.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140324_164917653.jpg
    IMG_20140324_164917653.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 472
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about you rotate that scan and try to get as much of the explanation as you can.
 
Ok, I just looked it up online and it is fairly straight forward. I just don't understand how you can write the mathematical statement 212 = 106.2 + 0 and be ok with that. It makes me want to torch the book. I still have no idea what they are doing even after getting a coherent explanation.
 
1MileCrash said:
My book is utterly useless - it vaguely gives me a history behind it, its motivations, and then lists an example in which it precedes to write a bunch of utterly false statements and then just.. spits out the answer.

Can someone explain to me what on Earth is going on in the attached picture? If this is not a notational confusion or typos in my book, then I must assert that Euclid's Algorithm makes absolutely no sense. 212 = 106.2, therefore here you go. I demand the author be sent to the lunatic asylum immediately.
1.106 is meaning 1 times 106, I think...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Michael Hardy
Mandelbroth said:
1.106 is meaning 1 times 106, I think...

Oh thank goodness, now I don't have to switch majors.

Thanks you two.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K