Undergrad Can someone explain this Energy Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Explain
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the concept of total mechanical energy loss due to work done by other forces, specifically in the context of the work-energy theorem. Participants clarify that while energy is conserved in frictionless scenarios, the application of the equation Wother = E2 - E1 is essential for understanding energy transformations. The example of a small spring firing a ten-tonne truck raises questions about the relationship between mass and height achieved, leading to the derivation of the equation h = kx^2 / 2mg. It is confirmed that as mass increases, the height reached decreases, illustrating the inverse relationship between mass and height in this context. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the work-energy theorem to analyze mechanical energy in various scenarios.
Lori
So- I'm going to confused with the concept of total mechanical energy that's loss due to work other. I provided an example below.

When do I apply this equation of Wother=E2-E2? I get confused cause I thought frictionless meant that energy is conserved.
Screenshot_20171110-151116.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20171110-151116.jpg
    Screenshot_20171110-151116.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 719
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you expect a small spring to be able to fire a ten-tonne truck as high as a marble?
 
PeroK said:
Would you expect a small spring to be able to fire a ten-tonne truck as high as a marble?
I know that, but I want to understand it with the work energy theorem. I don't really understand it.
 
Lori said:
I know that, but I want to understand it with the work energy theorem. I don't really understand it.

Why not calculate the height both blocks reach?
 
PeroK said:
Why not calculate the height both blocks reach?
Is it .5kx^2 = mgh so h= kx^2 / 2mg

So when mass increases, height decreases?

Did i get the equation right ?
 
Lori said:
Is it .5kx^2 = mgh so h= kx^2 / 2mg

So when mass increases, height decreases?

Did i get the equation right ?

Yes, that's it.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K