Can spinfoam/LQG use a G at particle size?

  • Thread starter jal
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Particle
In summary, this conversation discusses the problem of the origin of mass and how it is related to the hierarchy problem. The authors propose a new mass generation mechanism through the curvature of space-time, which could potentially provide a natural solution to this problem. Additionally, the concept of a discrete equation with a discreteness scale is introduced, with potential implications for the minimum surface area and particle size.
  • #1
jal
549
0
Here is something to help.
There are some interesting calculations in this paper.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0708/0708.2590v1.pdf
Hierarchy Problem, Dilatonic Fifth Force, and Origin of Mass
Y. M. Cho and J. H. Kim
20 Aug 2007
This is precisely the equation which has been proposed to resolve the hierarchy problem [5, 6], which shows that a large v can easily bring GP to the order of the elementary particle scale. Of course, in the popular dimensional reduction in which the (4+n)-dimensional space is treated as physical, the internal space can not assume a large scale because it has to be invisible at present energy scale. For this reason the size has often been assumed to be of the Planck scale, with v = 1 [3, 9, 10]. But we emphasize that a relatively large internal space has not been ruled out theoretically as well as experimentally [7, 13].

This tells that the hierarchy problem is closely related to the problem of the origin of mass. Moreover, this demonstrates that there is another mass generation mechanism other than the Higgs mechanism, a geometric mass generation through the curvature of space-time. Understanding the origin of mass has been a fundamental problem in physics. The geometric mass generation mechanism could provide a natural resolution to this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Fred Doyle would have loved this.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3288
The probability of inflation in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Authors: William Nelson
(Submitted on 24 Aug 2007)
p.3
When formulated in these terms the evolution equation (the Hamiltonian
constraint) is a discrete equation, with a discreteness scale given by aPl =
p/6lPl, where lPl is the Planck length and is the Barbero-Immirzi parameter.
----------------
I can add that when using 6lPl the minimum surface area will be 24lPl (as per the bounce model and the minimum length model).
And when adding Lisa Randall or the calculations of Y. M. Cho and J. H. Kim
then Pl can becomes particle size.

Interestinggggg!. Beginning!
-----------
 
  • #3


I cannot provide a definitive answer without further research and experimentation, but based on my understanding of spinfoam/LQG (loop quantum gravity), it is possible that they could use a G (gravitational constant) at particle size. Spinfoam/LQG is a theoretical framework that attempts to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics, and it is still an active area of research with many unanswered questions. However, the concept of a dimensional reduction and a relatively large internal space, as discussed in the paper, could potentially be incorporated into spinfoam/LQG. The idea of a geometric mass generation mechanism through the curvature of space-time is also in line with the principles of spinfoam/LQG.

There are also ongoing efforts to incorporate the Standard Model of particle physics into spinfoam/LQG, which could potentially provide a more complete understanding of the hierarchy problem and the origin of mass. However, more research and experimentation is needed to fully explore the possibilities and limitations of spinfoam/LQG in regards to particle size and mass generation. It is an exciting and complex area of study that will continue to be explored by scientists in the future.
 

1. Can spinfoam/LQG be used to describe particles at the G scale?

Currently, there is no definitive answer to this question. Spinfoam and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) are still areas of ongoing research and development, and their applicability to describing particles at the G scale is still being explored. Some theories suggest that spinfoam and LQG may be able to describe particles at the G scale, while others argue that they may not be suitable for this purpose.

2. How does spinfoam/LQG differ from other quantum gravity theories?

Spinfoam and LQG differ from other quantum gravity theories in their approach to quantizing gravity. Spinfoam uses a discrete, network-like structure, while LQG uses a discrete, loop-like structure. Both theories are based on the principles of general relativity, but they differ in their mathematical formalism and methods of calculation.

3. What are the main challenges in using spinfoam/LQG to describe particles at the G scale?

One of the main challenges in using spinfoam/LQG to describe particles at the G scale is the issue of renormalizability. This refers to the ability of a theory to produce finite, meaningful results when applied to extremely high energy scales. Some argue that spinfoam/LQG are not renormalizable, which presents a significant obstacle in their application to particles at the G scale.

4. Are there any experimental results supporting the use of spinfoam/LQG at the G scale?

At this time, there are no experimental results that definitively support the use of spinfoam/LQG at the G scale. However, there have been some theoretical studies and simulations that suggest spinfoam/LQG may be able to describe particles at this scale. Further research and experimentation are needed to confirm these results.

5. How could the use of spinfoam/LQG at the G scale impact our understanding of the universe?

If spinfoam/LQG are able to successfully describe particles at the G scale, it could have a significant impact on our understanding of the universe. It could potentially provide a more complete and unified theory of quantum gravity, allowing us to better understand the fundamental laws and dynamics of the universe at the smallest scales. It could also have implications for our understanding of black holes and the early universe.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
825
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
72
Views
5K
Back
Top