Loren Booda
- 3,115
- 4
Would you agree that statistics can be mathematically misrepresented to prove most related arguments both true and false?
The discussion revolves around the manipulation of statistics and whether they can be misrepresented to support both true and false arguments. Participants explore the implications of data mining, the integrity of statistical models, and the general public's understanding of statistics.
Participants express differing views on the nature of statistical misrepresentation and its implications. There is no consensus on the extent to which statistics can be manipulated or the definitions of misrepresentation.
Participants highlight the complexity of statistical interpretation and the potential for misuse, but do not resolve the nuances of what constitutes misrepresentation or the conditions under which it occurs.
Loren Booda said:Would you agree that statistics can be mathematically misrepresented to prove most related arguments both true and false?
That's what I needed to hear.FredGarvin said:I would say that proper statistical models usually rely on a very strict application of techniques and assumptions. It is an area that is not well known by most people so it is very easy to use them improperly. It is no different than any other form of mathematics. People misrepresent statistics. The math does not lie.
Loren Booda said:Would you agree that statistics can be mathematically misrepresented to prove most related arguments both true and false?