Can Stirling's Formula Derive the Normal Distribution from the Binomial?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RedX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Normal
RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
I want to show that the binomial distribution:

[tex]P(m)=\frac{n!}{(n-m)!m!}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}[/tex]

using Stirling's formula:

[tex]n!=n^n e^{-n} \sqrt{2\pi n}[/tex]

reduces to the normal distribution:

[tex]P(m)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi n}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{p(1-p)}}<br /> <br /> exp[-\frac{1}{2}\frac{(m-np)^2}{np(1-p)}][/tex]

Unfortunately, I keep on getting an extra term linear in m-np:

[tex]exp[\frac{m-np}{2n}\frac{2p-1}{(1-p)p}][/tex]

This term is zero if p=1/2, but I want to show that the binomial distribution reduces to the normal distribution for any probability p.

Has anyone else had this problem, as I'm sure this derivation is fairly common?
 
It would help to show your derivation in detail. In any case the central limit theorem could be used.
 
mathman said:
It would help to show your derivation in detail. In any case the central limit theorem could be used.

Sure. It's a little bit lengthy though, so it might take some work to read it:

[tex] P(m)=\frac{\sqrt{2 \pi n}n^ne^{-n}}{\sqrt{2 \pi m}m^me^{-m}*\sqrt{2 \pi (n-m)}(n-m)^{(n-m)}e^{-(n-m)}}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}=<br /> <br /> \frac{n^{n+1}}{\sqrt{2 \pi n}*m^{m+\frac{1}{2}}*(n-m)^{(n-m)+\frac{1}{2}}}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{n^{n+1}}{\sqrt{2 \pi n}*m^{m+\frac{1}{2}}*(n-m)^{(n-m)+\frac{1}{2}}}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}=<br /> <br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi n}} \exp[\log[\frac{n^{n+1}}{m^{m+\frac{1}{2}}*(n-m)^{(n-m)+\frac{1}{2}}}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}]][/tex]


[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi n}} \exp(\log[\frac{n^{n+1}}{m^{m+\frac{1}{2}}*(n-m)^{(n-m)+\frac{1}{2}}}p^m(1-p)^{n-m}]]=<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi n}}\exp[(n+1) \log n -(m+^1/_2) \log m [/tex]

[tex]-(n-m+^1/_2) \log (n-m)+m\log p + (n-m) \log[1-p] ][/tex]

Now I set m=pn+k in the expression, where pn is the average number of successes, and k is the difference from the average, and use that k<<<pn to expand the logarithms in power series up to second order (i.e., ln(1+x)=x-.5x^2).

So for example:

[tex](m+^1/_2) \log m=(pn+k+^1/_2)\log (pn+k)=<br /> (pn+k+^1/_2)[\log (pn)+\log (1+k/(pn))]=<br /> (pn+k+^1/_2)[\log (pn)+k/(pn)-.5 k^2/(pn)^2]<br /> [/tex]

After keeping all terms up to second order, I get:

[tex]P(m)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi n}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{p(1-p)}}\exp[-\frac{1}{2}\frac{k^2}{np(1-p)}] \exp[\frac{k}{2n} \frac{2p-1}{(1-p)p}][/tex]

and that last factor doesn't make sense, but I've checked my results three times and it keeps coming out. But if p=1/2, then it becomes 1, and I do get the normal distribution.
 
Just a thought: Stirlings approximation for n! doesn't converge to n! as n approaches infinity. However the ratio of the approximation to n! converges to 1. Does anyone know the situation whe we use Stirings approximations for [itex]C_r^n[/itex] ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K