Can Symmetry Solve the Dilemma of Buridan's Ass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PFanalog57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical paradox known as "Buridan's ass," which illustrates a scenario where a donkey, placed equidistantly between two identical piles of food, fails to make a decision and ultimately starves. Participants explore the implications of symmetry and decision-making, suggesting that the donkey could resolve its dilemma by adopting a spontaneous or arbitrary choice mechanism, such as flipping a coin. The conversation also delves into the nature of free will and decision-making in both animals and humans, questioning whether choices are truly free or influenced by underlying biological processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Buridan's ass paradox
  • Familiarity with concepts of symmetry in philosophy
  • Basic knowledge of decision-making theories
  • Awareness of free will debates in philosophy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Buridan's ass paradox in modern decision theory
  • Explore philosophical literature on free will and determinism
  • Investigate the role of randomness in decision-making processes
  • Examine studies on handedness and its correlation with brain hemispheric specialization
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, cognitive scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of decision-making, free will, and logical paradoxes.

  • #31
Russell E. Rierson said:
Yes but how would the donkey choose which pile represented heads? and which pile represented tails? :wink:
He wouldn't - he'd make the coin from scratch with a left and a right side. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
selfAdjoint said:
See the discussion of handedness above. It needn't involve free will, it could just be "programmed" by evolution.
Right, that's what I said.
me said:
And if handedness is genetic, the "choice" is predetermined. But nevermind, it's rather weak and not very relevant to the question.
And humans aren't the only primates that display handedness. I posted a link to articles concerning handedness in chimps.

I didn't think it was relevant because the question seemed like a philosophical question stated as a physical example (i.e. it doesn't matter that the animal is a donkey, it could be a frog, etc.).
But if we are going to talk about physical animals, the situation is predetermined if the animal's choice is phenotypical (term?). Agree? Are some animal behaviors not phenotypical? Is it possible that decision-making is an emergent property of animals? Is it possible that the genotype's environment includes nonphysical things? (that last question introduces the weakness IMO.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
11K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
12K