Can the Alcubierre Drive Work Without Exotic Matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TimDubya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of the Alcubierre Drive concept, specifically exploring the potential use of micro black holes (MBHs) as a means to create gravitational space distortion without relying on exotic matter. Participants examine theoretical implications, engineering challenges, and the mechanics of propulsion in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using micro black holes to condense space in front of a ship, theorizing that as the ship approaches the MBHs, they would evaporate, allowing for traversal of interstellar distances while moving at sub-light speeds.
  • Another participant challenges this idea, stating that the proposed micro black hole propulsion system violates the law of conservation of momentum, asserting that the ship would not be able to accelerate beyond the speed of light.
  • A clarification is made that the intention is not to use black holes for propulsion but to create a gradient of condensed space that the ship could move into using conventional means.
  • One participant discusses the concept of falling down a "space hill" created by the MBHs and notes that the center of mass of the black holes, ship, and evaporated radiation would remain constant, suggesting that propulsion would require asymmetry in the radiation emitted.
  • Another participant expresses concern about the potential risks, questioning what might prevent the ship from being trapped or torn apart instead of successfully riding the wave of distorted space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the viability of using micro black holes for space distortion and propulsion. There is no consensus on the feasibility of the proposed ideas, and multiple competing perspectives are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the behavior of micro black holes, the mechanics of space distortion, and the implications of conservation laws, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

TimDubya
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I didn't really know where to put this.

So a few months ago I was reading about the Alcubierre Drive and became fascinated with the prospects of this theory. However I was disheartened that so many felt it was unattainable due to the need for exotic matter. Recently I came across this paper:http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1803v1"

My understanding of gravitational space distortion is limited. However optimistically, if my guess is within the ballpark, you could use micro black holes to condense space in front of a ship. As the MBH's are fired out the front and the ship approaches them I assume they would evaporate rather quickly, so as you approach each MBH you fired previously space far in front of the ship would be condensed by subsequent MBH's while space close in front of the ship would be uncurved. Locally you would be moving at sub light but you could traverse great interstellar distances in this fashion.

I understand the engineering requirements for such a ship would be astronomical, however in the paper it suggests a method for using the MBH's as a power source, If this is sound I suppose you could just have a few power generating MBH's on board operating the pressing lasers and other systems. You would need to carry a considerable amount of condensing material for the propulsion but theoretically couldn't these be anything from tungsten to bed sheets?

Any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The article you link and the theory you describe are completely different. Your "micro black hole propulsion system" is completely untenable as it violates the law of conservation of momentum. So, in reality, your starship will go nowhere. Furthermore, all you are using is gravitational acceleration to try to move. So even if you had a sister ship laying black holes out in front of you, you will never accelerate to faster than the speed of light.
 
Well the article was just for feasibility of producing black holes. I should clarify I did not mean to infer that the black holes would act as propulsion, rather you would use conventional means to propel your ship but would be moving into a gradient of condensed space.
 
Hi TimDubya, Welcome to PF!

TimDubya said:
Recently I came across this paper:http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1803v1"
That is a really cool paper! :cool: Thanks for the link.

TimDubya said:
As the MBH's are fired out the front and the ship approaches them I assume they would evaporate rather quickly, so it would be like falling down a space hill instead of Alcubierres warp bubble.
AFAIK the center of mass of the BH, ship, evaporated radiation, would remain constant so the only way to actually propel the ship would be to induce some sort of asymmetry in the radiation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaleSpam said:
Hi TimDubya, Welcome to PF!

That is a really cool paper! :cool: Thanks for the link.

AFAIK the center of mass of the BH, ship, evaporated radiation, would remain constant so the only way to actually propel the ship would be to induce some sort of asymmetry in the radiation.

I've been here awhile I just never posted but thank you xD

Ok it seems that line is the one that Is being misunderstood so I changed it, I don't mean that the BH's would act as propulsion but that they would distort space in such a way as to make the apparent distance to the destination less than it is relatively. You would be riding a wave as it were, the ship encompassed by flat space behind an area of large curvature. But I could be way off with my assumptions.
 
what's to stop the ship being trapped and ripped apart instead of riding the wave?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K