Can the Dirac Delta Impulse be eliminated in this differential equation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Not_a_Sheldon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation involving the Dirac delta function, specifically examining whether it can be reformulated without the delta function. The context includes both theoretical and numerical approaches to solving the equation, as well as considerations of more complex systems involving non-linear dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation with a Dirac delta function and questions the possibility of eliminating the delta function by incorporating its effects into the initial conditions.
  • Another participant suggests using the properties of the delta function and refers to external resources for further understanding.
  • A different participant proposes a method involving integrating factors to solve the linear equation and provides a detailed derivation of the solution, highlighting the behavior of the solution before and after the impulse occurs.
  • A later reply introduces a more complex system involving a non-linear equation and expresses the need for an equivalent formulation without the delta function or numerical techniques for integration.
  • One participant suggests substituting the Dirac delta function with a finite impulse for numerical methods, emphasizing the importance of the time discretization in numerical integration.
  • Another participant raises a question about the physical interpretation of the delta term and the starting point for integration, suggesting that discussing the physical context may help in finding appropriate solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches and methods for dealing with the Dirac delta function, but no consensus is reached on a definitive solution or formulation. The discussion remains open with multiple competing views and techniques proposed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the properties of the Dirac delta function and its implications for both analytical and numerical solutions. The complexity of the non-linear equation is acknowledged, indicating that the initial example may not fully capture the challenges of the more complicated system.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in differential equations, impulse response systems, numerical methods for solving differential equations, and applications in enzyme kinetics or similar fields.

Not_a_Sheldon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey experts,

I have the following differential equation with an impulse described by the Dirac delta function

dx/dt (t) = - a⋅x(t) + d⋅delta(t) x(0)=0

with a,d scalars. My problem is this delta function in the right hand side.

Is there an equivalent formulation without the delta function, e.g. putting the d into the initial value?

How could I solve this numerically, e.g. in Matlab?

Many thanks for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "delta function" is defined in terms of its integral properties so we want to be able to write a solution in terms of an integral. This is a linear equation so it is easy to find an "integrating factor". Write the equation as dx/dt+ ax= \delta(t). We want to find a function u(t) such that multiplying by it, to get u dx/dt+ axu, gives an "exact derivative", d(ux)/dt. Of course, d(ux)/dt= u(dx/dt)+ (du/dt)x so, setting those equal, u(dx/dt}+ (du/dt)x= u (dx/dt)+ axu, we must have (du/dx)x= axu or just du/dt= au which has u= e^{at} as a solution.

That is, our equation is just e^{at}(dx/dt)+ axe^{at}= d(e^{at}x)/dt= e^{at}\delta(t) and we solve by integrating both sides, integrating from negative infinity to t:
The integral of e^{at}\delta(t) is 0 if the integration does not include 0, e^{a(0)}= 1 if it does. e^{at}x(t)= C or x(t)= Ce^{-at} if t<0, e^{at}x(t)= 1+ C or x(t)= (1+ C)e^{-at} if t\ge 0. Since we must have x(0)= 0, we must have x(0)= 1+ C= 0, C= -1.

x(t)= -e^{-at} if t< 0, x(t)= 0 if t\ge 0.
 
Thanks guys,

Unfortunately, the final system I am interested in is much more complicated and contains the following non-linear equation (michaelis menten) as a sub unit.

dx/dt = - (a*x(t))/(b+x(t)) + d *delta(t) x(0) = 0

The example above was just a simple example. So it is more proper to write

dx/dt = f(x(t)) + d*delta(t) x(0)=x0

where x and d are n-dimensional. Hence, I cannot solve this analytically and therefore, I am looking for an equivalent formulation without delta (if it exists) or some numerically techniques to integrate to whole system with delta.

I hardly remember a talk about impulsive differential equations. Is this a IDE?

Any ideas?
 
One approach to the numerical method is, depending on your method, to substitute for the Dirac delta function, an impulse that takes a finite amount of time but with similar properties under your numerical integration method.

i.e. if you method involves dividing the time axis into lots of smaller times ##\Delta t## then the ##\Delta t## block at t=0 corresponding to ##A\delta(t)## has value ##A/\Delta t## so the integral behaves itself.

I'm pretty sure HallsofIvy knows a better one though.
 
So this is enzyme kinetics? I think it is useful with ill-defined mathematical problems to discuss what they describe physically to pick the right solution. What does the delta term stand for? Where does integration start (t=0 or t=-infinity)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K