Can the LHC Create Atom-Sized Black Holes?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hsdrop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes Lhc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has the theoretical potential to create atom-sized black holes during proton collisions; however, such occurrences have not been observed. Cosmic rays with higher energies than those produced by the LHC frequently impact Earth without resulting in black holes, indicating that their formation is unlikely. The discussion highlights the relationship between black hole size and Hawking radiation, noting that smaller black holes emit more radiation but have shorter lifespans. Ultimately, while microscopic black holes could theoretically form, their rarity and the energy constraints of the LHC suggest they are not a significant concern.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics and Hawking radiation
  • Familiarity with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and its operational parameters
  • Knowledge of particle collision energy and its implications
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics, particularly the conservation of energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole stability
  • Explore the operational limits and energy outputs of the LHC
  • Investigate cosmic ray interactions and their effects on Earth
  • Study the principles of black hole thermodynamics and their relevance to particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students interested in particle physics, black hole research, and the implications of high-energy collisions in particle accelerators.

hsdrop
Messages
324
Reaction score
114
Is it possible for the L.H.C. to have an atom size (or smaller) black hole from the collision chambers??
This will lead up to a bigger question if it a possible yes, I just don't want to sound like a moron right off the bat.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hsdrop said:
Is it possible for the L.H.C. to have an adam size (or smaller) black hole from the collision chambers??

I assume you mean an atom sized black hole.
While theoretically possible, this is not believed to be a problem since cosmic rays with energies larger than what the LHC can produce impact the Earth all the time and we aren't all stuck inside a black hole.
 
Ok but I was not going that way with my question, I do know better on that idea.
I was wondering about Hawking Radiation. I was reading that the larger holes (or ones with more gravitational forces) give off less blackbody radiation than ones with a smaller gravitational force. The smaller that gets the more blackbody radiation it expels. The smallest one could get would be atom size with the most radiation given off right before it evaporates with a bang.
So would that not cause huge problems in the chamber and be easily noticed ??
I really hope that I'm understanding at least a little of what I'm asking about.
 
No, the energy release would never be bigger than what you put into a single collision. The detectors were built for handling energies of that size.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
So... is that proof that atom size holes do not form in the lhc??
 
No.

They could form. They have not been observed so far, so either the energy is not sufficient (very likely) or they are incredibly rare at the current energy (possible, but unlikely).

They would lead to a large number of particles at medium energies hitting the detectors, with a large total energy (but smaller than the total collision energy) - quite easy to find.
 
Thank you everyone for taking the time to answer my questions, I just have one more left.
Am I misunderstanding the concept of hawking radiation with the size of the singularity and the blackbody radiation rate?
 
The singularity (if it exists at all) doesn't have a size. The black hole with its event horizon has something that can be called a size.

Smaller black holes have a larger power. A microscopic black hole at the LHC would have a very high power - but it would also have an incredibly short lifetime. The total energy emitted is just the energy put in - at most the collision energy of the protons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
Ok I believe I understand it now.( man I feel dumb now :doh: )
I did not take into account the first law of thermodynamics the conservation of energy.
Thank you again for helping me understand the concept.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
21K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K