Can the Odds of Similar Globally Influential Surnames Overlapping Be Calculated?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cryptonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the odds of similar globally influential surnames overlapping, specifically focusing on the names "Obama" and "Osama" during the period from 2001 to 2011. Participants explore the implications of these names appearing concurrently in history and whether such occurrences can be quantified mathematically.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses incredulity at the simultaneous prominence of the names "Obama" and "Osama," questioning the improbability of such a coincidence.
  • Another participant argues that the odds cannot be calculated due to vagueness in terms like "globally-influential" and "at the same time," suggesting that the criteria for evaluation are unclear.
  • Concerns are raised about the commonality of names, with one participant noting that "Hussein" is a common name, which complicates the argument for improbability.
  • Several participants introduce additional examples of name pairings that could be perceived as unusual, suggesting that such occurrences are not unique to the names in question.
  • A participant acknowledges the conspiratorial angle initially presented but later expresses appreciation for the rational counterarguments provided by others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; some lean towards the idea of coincidence, while others entertain the notion of a conspiratorial interpretation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the calculation of odds and the significance of the name overlap.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the ambiguity in defining terms and the subjective nature of what constitutes an "unusual" occurrence, which may affect the analysis of the names' prominence.

Cryptonic
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Yes OF COURSE I am referring to "Obama" and "Osama". I find it incredulous that these two names pop up at this particular moment in history (ie '01-'11).

What are the odds? They are both unusual - in fact I have NEVER heard either of them before (but of course that says more about my Western culture I suppose).

Can it be mathematically "guesstimated" just how improbable it is that 2 names so close together like this pop up at exact same time in human history?

And when we look at the name "Hussein"... well surely that tips the odds into infinity?

I am not here to postulate anything, nor sprout any conspiracy theory. I am posting here in the "General Math" forum to find out if the odds can actually be calculated.

I want some SCIENCE here, not speculation. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Cryptonic said:
Yes OF COURSE I am referring to "Obama" and "Osama". I find it incredulous that these two names pop up at this particular moment in history (ie '01-'11).
You mean you find it incredible, or perhaps you are incredulous. Sorry, I'm a confirmed pedant -- I can't resist. :-)

My answer to your question would be no, the odds can't be calculated, at least not in any way that would satisfy me. There are too many parts of the question that are vague. For instance, what exactly does "globally-influential" mean? What does "at the same time" mean? That they're alive at the same time? Prominent in the news at the same time? (I would argue that Obama and Osama never met that criterion.) And then there are the add-ons you adduce as additional arguments: that Obama and Osama are uncommon names, and that Obama's middle name is Hussein. (Although I don't understand why that last one makes the thing seem any more strange to you -- Hussein is, after all, a very common name.) How are we to evaluate, not just the odds that these particular events could occur, but that there should be SOMETHING you could point to that would seem odd?

It is always possible, no matter what happens, to find something about it that seems unusual or a priori improbable. But lots and lots and lots of things occur every day, and the things that actually occur are astronomically exceeded in number by the possible unusual things that could have occurred, but didn't.
 
Last edited:


Cryptonic said:
Yes OF COURSE I am referring to "Obama" and "Osama". I find it incredulous that these two names pop up at this particular moment in history (ie '01-'11).

Like Bush and Rush?

Putin and Palin?

Harry Reid and Ishmael Reed?

Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, George Clinton?

A schmoke and a pancake? You could find hundreds of little wordplays among prominent people. Boehner, Boxer. Feinstein and Feingold. Nancy Pelosi and Jim Fregosi.

Bearing in mind, of course, that "Osama" is one particular variation of his name. Usama is also commonly seen, especially before 9/11. His FIRST name. By that logic, you'd compare George Bush to King George. A lot of people made that comparison during the Bush administation.

Harry Byrd, Larry Bird.

Orrin Hatch, Richard Hatch, Charlie Batch.

David Boren, Charles van Doren.
 
Last edited:


Thanks, guys, I take your good points onboard. This topic came up in a conversation, and I was arguing (I confess) the conspiratorial angle, while my more rational frriend was insisting it was mere coincidence. Thanks for your replies, they are very reasonable.
 


Cryptonic said:
Thanks, guys, I take your good points onboard. This topic came up in a conversation, and I was arguing (I confess) the conspiratorial angle, while my more rational frriend was insisting it was mere coincidence. Thanks for your replies, they are very reasonable.

Christine Keeler and John Archibald Wheeler!

(ok I'll stop now)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K