Can the Ricci Tensor's Trace be Applied to Tensors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of traces to tensors, specifically the relationship between the Ricci tensor and the Riemann tensor. The Ricci tensor, denoted as R_{ij}, is established as the contraction of the Riemann tensor, R^l_{k,ij}. It is clarified that tensor contraction, which sums over indices, can only be performed on mixed tensors, not on covariant or contravariant tensors. Additionally, the process of contracting the Ricci tensor to obtain scalar curvature R involves raising an index before contraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor contraction and its mathematical implications
  • Familiarity with the Ricci tensor and Riemann tensor in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of mixed tensors versus covariant and contravariant tensors
  • Basic grasp of scalar curvature and its calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor contraction in detail
  • Explore the mathematical definitions and applications of the Ricci tensor and Riemann tensor
  • Learn about mixed tensors and their role in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the concept of scalar curvature and its significance in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in differential geometry, general relativity, or anyone interested in advanced tensor analysis.

waht
Messages
1,499
Reaction score
4
Just wondering if Traces can be applied to tensors.

If the Ricci tensor is Rii then is sums over diagonal elements.

So technically, can you say the trace of the Riemann tensor is the Ricci tensor?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well what you are referring to is Tensor Contraction. A tensor contraction sums much like the trace of a matrix and gets rid of two indicies. Think of a matrix being a rank 2 tensor being contracted to a rank 0 (scalar) tensor. That is what a trace is, a specific form of a tensor contraction (if the matrix is made of tensor elements).
Here is the mathworld site:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TensorContraction.html
So in that case the Ricci tensor is contracted from the Riemann Tensor.
 
Thanks a lot,

For a trace, the matrix has to be n x n, right. So, can all tensors with a rank greater or equal to 2 be written as n x n matrices?

Sorry I'm asking a silly question, I didn't work with tensors in long time.
 
Last edited:
not exactly. Any tensor with an even rank can be contracted down to a nxn matrix (effectivly a rank 2 tensor), but odd rank tensors will be contracted to other odd rank tensors and ultimately a vector (n x 1 matrix).
Picture a rank 3 tensor as a n x n x n 'cubic matrix'. A contraction would basically take the trace of each level of this 'cubic matrix' and make a vector out of it.
I don't think there is a way to get rid of a single rank in the way of contraction. But all even rank tensors could be contracted (multiple times) down to a n x n matrix.
 
Thanks, that makes a lot more sense now.
 
One thing I should add:
The contraction can not be done with covariant or contravariant tensors , but only with mixed tensors. So, the Ricci tensor R_{ij}=R^k_{k,ij} is the contraction of Riemann's tensor R^l_{k,ij} (you can not contract R_{lk,ij}, one index should be rised).
Further, if you want to contract the Ricci tensor R_{ij}, you need first to rise the index 'i' and then contract g^{ki}R_{ij} by k=j. The result will be the scalar curvature R.
 
Last edited:
gvk said:
One thing I should add:
The contraction can not be done with covariant or contravariant tensors , but only with mixed tensors. So, the Ricci tensor R_{ij}=R^k_{k,ij} is the contraction of Riemann's tensor R^l_{k,ij} (you can not contract R_{lk,ij}, one index should be rised).
Further, if you want to contract the Ricci tensor R_{ij}, you need first to rise the index 'i' and then contract g^{ki}R_{ij} by k=j. The result will be the scalar curvature R.


Weyl tensor C_{abcd} is traceless in the sense g^{ab} g^{cd} C_{abcd} = 0? Am I right?
 
Omega137 said:
Weyl tensor C_{abcd} is traceless in the sense g^{ab} g^{cd} C_{abcd} = 0? Am I right?

Sorry; I've made a mistake in the indexing...

I should have said

C_{abcd} is traceless in the sense g^{ac} C_{abcd} = 0 or eqvivalently C^a_{bad} = 0 for arbitrary b , d

Sorry for the mistake...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K