I Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation?

bb1414
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is given by:

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi+V\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi##​

Obviously, there is a laplacian in the kinetic energy operator. So, I was wondering if the equation was rearranged as

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi##​

then does there exist a wave function ## \psi## that satisfies Laplace's equation

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=0##
so that

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi=0##
If so, can the solution then be a set of spherical harmonics, which is commonly found when dealing with Laplace's equation in other areas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My memory about the solution of Laplace's equation is a bit hazy but after checking wikipedia about spherical harmonics, the general solution of this equation takes the form of
$$
\psi(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{l=0} \sum_{m=-l}^l c_{lm} r^l Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)
$$
which is clearly not normalizable and hence cannot serve as a square integrable solution required to be an element of Hilbert space.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414 and Demystifier
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414
Demystifier said:
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.

That's true for an infinite 2-D plane. However, if your "universe" consists of a half-infinite cylinder, parametrized by x,y according to:
  • 0 \leq x \lt \infty
  • 0 \leq y \leq L
  • The point (x,y) and the point (x, y+L) are identified.
Then there are normalizable solutions of the form:

\psi(x,\theta) = e^{\frac{2n\pi}{L} (-x \pm i y)}
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and bb1414
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top