I Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores whether the time-dependent Schrödinger equation can be rearranged to satisfy Laplace's equation, specifically if a wave function exists such that the Laplacian equals zero. It notes that while spherical harmonics are a common solution for Laplace's equation, they are not normalizable and thus cannot be part of Hilbert space. Attempts to solve the equation using Fourier transforms lead to constant functions, which are also not square integrable. However, in a half-infinite cylindrical universe, normalizable solutions can be achieved. This indicates that the context of the problem significantly influences the existence of valid solutions.
bb1414
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is given by:

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi+V\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi##​

Obviously, there is a laplacian in the kinetic energy operator. So, I was wondering if the equation was rearranged as

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi##​

then does there exist a wave function ## \psi## that satisfies Laplace's equation

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=0##
so that

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi=0##
If so, can the solution then be a set of spherical harmonics, which is commonly found when dealing with Laplace's equation in other areas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My memory about the solution of Laplace's equation is a bit hazy but after checking wikipedia about spherical harmonics, the general solution of this equation takes the form of
$$
\psi(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{l=0} \sum_{m=-l}^l c_{lm} r^l Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)
$$
which is clearly not normalizable and hence cannot serve as a square integrable solution required to be an element of Hilbert space.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414 and Demystifier
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414
Demystifier said:
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.

That's true for an infinite 2-D plane. However, if your "universe" consists of a half-infinite cylinder, parametrized by x,y according to:
  • 0 \leq x \lt \infty
  • 0 \leq y \leq L
  • The point (x,y) and the point (x, y+L) are identified.
Then there are normalizable solutions of the form:

\psi(x,\theta) = e^{\frac{2n\pi}{L} (-x \pm i y)}
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and bb1414
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K