Undergrad Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores whether the time-dependent Schrödinger equation can be rearranged to satisfy Laplace's equation, specifically if a wave function exists such that the Laplacian equals zero. It notes that while spherical harmonics are a common solution for Laplace's equation, they are not normalizable and thus cannot be part of Hilbert space. Attempts to solve the equation using Fourier transforms lead to constant functions, which are also not square integrable. However, in a half-infinite cylindrical universe, normalizable solutions can be achieved. This indicates that the context of the problem significantly influences the existence of valid solutions.
bb1414
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is given by:

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi+V\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi##​

Obviously, there is a laplacian in the kinetic energy operator. So, I was wondering if the equation was rearranged as

##-\frac{\hslash^{2}}{2m}\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi##​

then does there exist a wave function ## \psi## that satisfies Laplace's equation

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=0##
so that

##\triangledown^{2}\psi=i\hslash\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi-V\psi=0##
If so, can the solution then be a set of spherical harmonics, which is commonly found when dealing with Laplace's equation in other areas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My memory about the solution of Laplace's equation is a bit hazy but after checking wikipedia about spherical harmonics, the general solution of this equation takes the form of
$$
\psi(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{l=0} \sum_{m=-l}^l c_{lm} r^l Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)
$$
which is clearly not normalizable and hence cannot serve as a square integrable solution required to be an element of Hilbert space.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414 and Demystifier
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.
 
  • Like
Likes bb1414
Demystifier said:
An attempt to solve the equation by a Fourier transform would lead to ##{\bf k}^2=0##, implying ##k_x=k_y=k_z=0##. That would correspond to a constant function, which is also not square integrable.

That's true for an infinite 2-D plane. However, if your "universe" consists of a half-infinite cylinder, parametrized by x,y according to:
  • 0 \leq x \lt \infty
  • 0 \leq y \leq L
  • The point (x,y) and the point (x, y+L) are identified.
Then there are normalizable solutions of the form:

\psi(x,\theta) = e^{\frac{2n\pi}{L} (-x \pm i y)}
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and bb1414
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K