Can These Second Order ODEs Model Planetary Trajectories?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Odes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the modeling of planetary trajectories using two second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Participants explore methods for solving these equations, which relate to gravitational forces and motion, and consider their implications in the context of celestial mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the first ODE, r''[t] - k/(r[t])^2 = 0, and seeks assistance in solving it, noting its relation to Newton's second law and gravitational force.
  • Another participant suggests using quadrature to solve the first ODE, proposing a substitution and integration method, but acknowledges the complexity of the integral involved.
  • There is a discussion about the second ODE, xy''[x] = ay[x] + b, with a suggestion to use a Taylor series solution and Frobenius' method, although some participants express uncertainty about their familiarity with power series solutions.
  • One participant questions the application of the chain rule in the derivation process and seeks clarification on the relationship between the variables involved.
  • Another participant corrects an earlier statement regarding the sign of the gravitational force in the first ODE, indicating that k should be negative, representing the attractive nature of gravity.
  • There is a recurring theme of difficulty in finding r(t) after integration, with participants expressing a desire to understand how to derive the trajectory from the integrated forms of the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solutions to the ODEs, with multiple approaches and interpretations presented. There is ongoing debate about the methods and correctness of the derivations, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the integration steps and the application of specific mathematical techniques, such as power series and the chain rule. The discussion highlights the complexity of the equations and the assumptions made in their derivation.

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody!

Here are two ODE 2nd order I tried to solve, but I failed :(

r''[t] - k/(r[t])^2 = 0

xy''[x] = ay[x] + b

Could anyone of you please help me?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the independent variable, t, does not appear in the first problem, it can be handled by "quadrature". Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. The equation for u is then ru'+ k/r^2= 0 which can be solved by a direct integration: ru'= -k/r^2 so u'= -k/r^3= -kr^(-3) and, finally, du= -kr^(-3)dr. Integrating, r'= u= (1/2)kr^(-2)+ C. That is a separable equation for r:
[tex]\frac{dr}{(1/2)kr^{-2}+ C}= \frac{r^2 dr}{(1/2)k+ Cr^2}= dt[/tex]
You may find the left side of that to be a very difficult integration.

As for the second, xy"= ay+ b, that is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients. It probably would be simplest to do this by taking y to be a Taylor's series solution. Since the leading coefficient is x, you will have to use Frobenius' method: let
[tex]y= \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n x^{n+c}[/itex] where c is an unknown number, not necessarily positive or integer. Do the differentiations term by term, put into the equation and assume that a<sub>0</sub> is <b>not</b> 0 to get an equation for c (the "indicial" equation). They try to get a recurrance relation for a<sub>n</sub>.[/tex]
 
" Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. "

u= r' - they are both functions of t, aren't they?
r"= u' is ok
u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt) - chain rule is ok, but how do you get to this:
u'= ru' from the chain rule?

As to the integral: I got:

t = r/C - Sqrt(k/(2C^3))*arctan(r*Sqrt(2C/k)) + C_1

now it's ok, but I cannot find r(t) :( and I need it, because the DE is Newton's 2nd Law applied to the gravitational force, considered k = GM ( M- mass, and G the grav. constant)

mr''[t] = GMm/r^2[t] <=> r''[t] - k/r^2[t] = 0

I was expecting ellipses or the conical intersections


2. DE: unfortunately I haven't learned how to solve DEs with power series :( but I'll try the ansatz and see what will come out :)
 
[EDIT]: it should be: mr''[t] = - GMm/r^2[t] and k = -GM , but 'k' is a constant nevertheless :)
 
Marin said:
" Let u= r'. r"= u' and, by the chain rule, u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt)= ru'. "

u= r' - they are both functions of t, aren't they?
r"= u' is ok
u'= du/dt= (du/dr)(dr/dt) - chain rule is ok, but how do you get to this:
u'= ru' from the chain rule?
Sorry, I miswrote: u' (du/dr)(dr/dt)= u du/dr The equation becomes u du/dr= k/r2 so u du= k r-2 dr which gives (1/2)u^2= -k/r+ C or
[tex]u= dr/dt= \sqrt{C- 2k/r}[/tex]

As to the integral: I got:

t = r/C - Sqrt(k/(2C^3))*arctan(r*Sqrt(2C/k)) + C_1

now it's ok, but I cannot find r(t) :( and I need it, because the DE is Newton's 2nd Law applied to the gravitational force, considered k = GM ( M- mass, and G the grav. constant)

mr''[t] = GMm/r^2[t] <=> r''[t] - k/r^2[t] = 0

I was expecting ellipses or the conical intersections


2. DE: unfortunately I haven't learned how to solve DEs with power series :( but I'll try the ansatz and see what will come out :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K