Can Vector AB Be Parallel to the Cross Product of Direction Vectors L1 and L2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deanchhsw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining if vector AB, derived from points on two lines L1 and L2, can be parallel to the cross product of their direction vectors. The calculated cross product of the direction vectors is (-5, -7, 1), and vector AB is expressed as (-3m - 2t - 1, 2m + t - 2, -m - 3t + 2). The challenge arises when attempting to find specific values for m and t that satisfy the condition of parallelism, as the equations derived from equating components do not yield consistent solutions. It is clarified that the lines are skew and do not intersect, complicating the interpretation of the problem. Ultimately, the focus is on solving the system of equations to find points A and B that meet the parallelism criteria.
deanchhsw
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
* This post was moved from the general math section by the poster himself

There are two lines:

L1 : x = 1 + 2t ; y = 2 - t ; z = -1 + 3t.
L2: x = 2 - 3m ; y = 2m ; z = 1 - m.

The problem states to find a general point on A on L1 and a general point B on L2, and then find the vector AB from those points.

Hence,

Vector AB = ( -3m - 2t - 1 , 2m + t - 2, -m -3t +2).

Then, the problem states to find specific points A and B such that vector AB is parallel to the product of direction vectors of lines L1 and L2.

using determinants, the product of direction vectors come out to be (-5,-7,1). I'm pretty sure it is. This also means that direction vector of vector AB has to be either (-5, -7, 1) or scalar multiples of it. But when I equate

-3m-2t-1 = -5
2m + t - 2 = -7
-m -3t +2 = 1

and do simultaneous equation, the value for m and t doesn't come out to be right. if it works for x and y, it doesnt' work for z, and so on.


…..additional info after not getting the first one responded


Here's what I meant by product of direction vectors.
direction vector L1 = (2,-1,3)
direction vector L2 = (-3,2,-1)

Thus D.V. L1 * D.V. L2 = det( i j k ) = (-5,-7,1)
.........( 2 -1 3 )
........ ( -3 2 -1 )

forgive me for using parenthesis where abstract value sign should be.
At any rate, that's what I meant by product.

if you pictured it correctly that it's the "cross product", that's what I originally figured: that since product of direction vector is perpendicular to the lines connecting the two "general points", it cannot be parallel. but I can't imagine that the problem is flawed because it is coming straight out of the infamous International Baccalaureate internal assessment sheet! So, here's the dilemma. I think I'm interpreting the problem in a wrong direction.

Since I really can't see what to do, I'll just present the full problem here:

Consider the two lines:

L1 : x = 1 + 2t ; y = 2 - t ; z = -1 + 3t.
L2: x = 2 - 3m ; y = 2m ; z = 1 - m.

4) Given that l-1 and l-2 are direction vectors for lines L1 and L2, find the vector product l-1 x l-2.

5) Taking a general point A on L1 and a general point B on L2, find the vector AB.

6) Find points A and B such that AB is parallel to l-1 x l-2.

7) Find the magnitude of vector AB.

...

As noted before, vector product, if I did things correctly, should be (-5,-7,1).
Number 5's answer, I believed, was
Vector AB = ( -3m - 2t - 1 , 2m + t - 2, -m -3t +2).
As I stated before in the question.

Number 6 is the point where I have trouble with- the way it is worded, it sounds as if two points each in Line L1 and L2 are supposed to be parallel to their direction vector products. I stared at the problem for 20 minutes, and yelled out, "THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE."

I'm really sorry that I had to resort to actually presenting a problem, but
please understand that I tried my best and even more.

Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it was posted in general math- and I answered it there- but I answered it wrong! I assumed that the two lines intersected and asserted that any such vector AB must lie in the plane defined by the two lines and so could not be parallel to the cross product which is perpendicular to that plane.

HOWEVER, in this case the two lines are skew. They do not intersect nor are they parallel and so they do not define a plane.

You are correct that the cross product vector is -5i- 7j+ k.
You are also correct that a vector between two points A and B on each of the lines must be of the form (-3m - 2t - 1)i+ (2m + t - 2)j+ (-m -3t +2)k.

Now, in order for two vectors two be parallel one must be a multiple of the other. In other words, you must have -3m- 2t- 1= -5p, 2m+ t- 2= -7p, -m-3t+ 2= p for some number p. That is 3 equations for the 3 variables m, t, p. You don't really need to know p but m and t will give you the points A and B.
 


First of all, don't worry about presenting the full problem. It helps to have all the information in order to understand the problem better.

Now, let's break down the problem and try to understand it step by step.

1) Given that l-1 and l-2 are direction vectors for lines L1 and L2, find the vector product l-1 x l-2.

This step simply asks you to find the cross product of the two direction vectors. And as you have correctly calculated, the cross product is (-5,-7,1).

2) Taking a general point A on L1 and a general point B on L2, find the vector AB.

This step is asking you to find the vector connecting any two general points on the two lines. And you have correctly calculated it as well: Vector AB = ( -3m - 2t - 1 , 2m + t - 2, -m -3t +2).

3) Find points A and B such that AB is parallel to l-1 x l-2.

This is where things get a little tricky. The wording of the problem is a bit confusing, but what it means is that you need to find specific points A and B such that the vector connecting them, AB, is parallel to the cross product of the direction vectors of the two lines.

You have correctly identified that in order for AB to be parallel to the cross product, it needs to be a scalar multiple of it. So, let's say we define a scalar k, then we can write:

Vector AB = k(-5,-7,1)

Substituting the values of AB that you have calculated, we get:

(-3m - 2t - 1, 2m + t - 2, -m -3t + 2) = k(-5,-7,1)

Now, we can equate the corresponding components to get a system of equations:

-3m - 2t - 1 = -5k
2m + t - 2 = -7k
-m - 3t + 2 = k

Solving this system of equations will give us the values of m and t, which in turn will give us the specific points A and B that we are looking for.

I hope this helps you understand the problem better. Good luck with your calculations!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
658
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K