Can You Calculate a P-Value for Correlation Between Non-Parametric Data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sobored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the p-value for the correlation between two non-parametric data sets, specifically using Pearson's correlation coefficient, which is inappropriate for non-parametric data. Instead, Spearman's correlation coefficient should be utilized for such data. The participants clarify that both groups consist of 35 continuous samples, and there is a suggestion to use the Student's T-test for predicting the p-value, although this approach is parametric and may not be suitable for non-parametric data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients
  • Knowledge of parametric vs. non-parametric statistical tests
  • Familiarity with the Student's T-test
  • Basic concepts of experimental design and data types
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate Spearman's correlation coefficient
  • Research the assumptions and applications of the Student's T-test
  • Explore non-parametric statistical tests for correlation
  • Study experimental design principles to determine appropriate statistical tests
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, researchers in biological sciences, and anyone involved in analyzing non-parametric data correlations.

sobored
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I have made a correlation between group A and B and the pearsson coefficient constant, r, is at 0.97. The values are expression levels and hence they are non-parametric. I wonder how can i calculate the p-value of this correlation between group A and B? I know how to calculate the p-value for the difference between group A and B, but not for the correlation between group A and B.


Thanks for any inputs!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pearson's correlation coefficient is a parametric statistic. If your data require a non-parametric test (how did you determine this?), then you can't use Pearson's correlations, but should instead be using Spearman's correlation coefficient, which is the non-parametric counterpart to Pearson's. But, nobody will be able to help you beyond that without more information about the data set you're working with. What's your sample size? Do you have continuous or integer data, random or fixed variables, etc? Basically, without knowing your experimental design, nobody can recommend an appropriate statistical test.
 
Moonbear said:
Pearson's correlation coefficient is a parametric statistic. If your data require a non-parametric test (how did you determine this?), then you can't use Pearson's correlations, but should instead be using Spearman's correlation coefficient, which is the non-parametric counterpart to Pearson's. But, nobody will be able to help you beyond that without more information about the data set you're working with. What's your sample size? Do you have continuous or integer data, random or fixed variables, etc? Basically, without knowing your experimental design, nobody can recommend an appropriate statistical test.


Thanks for helping me out.

Both groups have 35 samples and the values are continues. Can i use student T test to predict this p-value, assumming that i use the parametric way?
 
sobored said:
Thanks for helping me out.
Both groups have 35 samples and the values are continues. Can i use student T test to predict this p-value, assumming that i use the parametric way?
I believe you can; as explained in this link or http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/rsig.html. (Both from a Yahoo! search on significance test for correlation coefficient.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K