Can You Change Photon Polarization Without Affecting Entanglement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of whether photon polarization can be changed without affecting entanglement, exploring the implications of polarization manipulation on entangled photon pairs. Participants examine theoretical and practical aspects of polarization changes, measurements, and the nature of entanglement.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that photon polarization can be changed using wave plates without disturbing entanglement, suggesting that entangled states remain intact despite polarization rotation.
  • Others question whether changing polarization constitutes a measurement that could break entanglement, leading to a discussion about the nature of measurement versus rotation.
  • It is proposed that while rotating polarization alters the state of one photon, it does not instantaneously change the state of the entangled partner photon, thus preventing faster-than-light communication.
  • Some participants emphasize that sending photons through a polarizer constitutes a measurement that would destroy entanglement, contrasting this with mere rotation.
  • There is a suggestion that the relationship between entangled photons changes when one is manipulated, leading to different but still correlated states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether changing polarization affects entanglement, with some arguing it does not while others suggest it might. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of polarization manipulation on entanglement and the potential for faster-than-light communication.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various types of polarization states (horizontal, vertical, circular, elliptical) and the distinction between measurement and manipulation, indicating a nuanced understanding of quantum mechanics. However, the discussion lacks consensus on the implications of these manipulations for entanglement and communication.

jadrian
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, you can.

a) If you knew it before, and measured the same thing again: If it is entangled (in some other basis than polarization obviously), it will remain entangled. And it is generally not otherwise disturbed.

b) Using a wave plate, you can twist the polarization by any amount. If it is polarization entangled, it will remain entangled.
 


Change? Yes, easily. You can rotate the polarization of a photon with a half or quarter waveplate without otherwise disturbing the photon. Observe? Yes and no. If you have a single (non entangled) photon in an unknown polarization state, you cannot determine its polarization without disturbing it, as when you measure its polarization it ends up in whatever state it was measured to be in. However, if you have two entangled photons, you can do a measurement on one without disturbing the other, then you can know its state without doing a direct measurement. However, you still disturb the joint two photon state. Also, for a single photon, you can perform weak measurements, which tell you something but not everything about the state of the photon.
 


DrChinese said:
b) Using a wave plate, you can twist the polarization by any amount. If it is polarization entangled, it will remain entangled.

Since we have changed/twisted, hence measured (?), the polarization by the wave plate, have we not broken the entanglement?
 
Last edited:


San K said:
Since we have changed/twisted, hence measured, the polarization by the wave plate, have we not broken the entanglement?

Rotating the polarization, which includes changing horizontal to vertical or even linear to circular or elliptical, is not a measurement, only a rotation. It will change the state, but entanglement is preserved. If you send one or both photons in an entangled pair (entangled in polarization, at least) through a polarizer, then that is a projection and will destroy the entanglement.
 


Mr_Physicist said:
Rotating the polarization, which includes changing horizontal to vertical or even linear to circular or elliptical, is not a measurement, only a rotation. It will change the state, but entanglement is preserved. If you send one or both photons in an entangled pair (entangled in polarization, at least) through a polarizer, then that is a projection and will destroy the entanglement.

so you can't back and forth messages through entanglement. that's the only answer i was after. if you could it would spacedock einstein and take a dump on relativity/information theory
 


Mr_Physicist said:
Rotating the polarization, which includes changing horizontal to vertical or even linear to circular or elliptical, is not a measurement, only a rotation. It will change the state, but entanglement is preserved. If you send one or both photons in an entangled pair (entangled in polarization, at least) through a polarizer, then that is a projection and will destroy the entanglement.

if we can change the polarization of A from say horizontal to vertical, and entanglement is preserved then polarization of B will also change instantaneously to vertical?

that way information can be passed to B via manipulation of A FTL (faster than light), which is not possible. so somewhere along this chain of thought, something is not right...
 


San K said:
if we can change the polarization of A from say horizontal to vertical, and entanglement is preserved then polarization of B will also change instantaneously to vertical?

that way information can be passed to B via manipulation of A FTL (faster than light), which is not possible. so somewhere along this chain of thought, something is not right...

Your error is in the first sentence. Rotating the polarization of photon A does not rotate photon B. Photon A will still be entangled with photon B, but the relationship will be different, i.e. where in the previous case both photons would be found to be in the same polarization state, if you rotate one photon they will both be found to be in different, but still correlated, states. Entanglement is preserved, but doing a measurement or projection on one photon will not affect the other photon in any way that allows FTL communication. Does this make sense? If no I can write out an example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K