MHB Can You Prove the Average of Trigonometric Numbers Equals Cot 1^o?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that the average of the numbers $n\sin n^{\circ}$ (where $n=2,\,4,\,6,\, \cdots,\,180$) is $\cot 1^{\circ}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
because we are dealing with sin of even numbers

we have

$2n\, \sin\, 2n^0\, \sin\, 1^0 = n \cos (2n - 1)^0 - n \cos (2n+ 1)^0$

there are 90 terms

now adding from 1 to 90 we get the sum

=$ \cos\, 1^0 + \cos\, 3^0 + \cdots + \cos\, 179^0 - 90 \,cos\, 181^0$

as for all the terms except the 1st and last term

we have $- n\, \cos (2n+ 1)^0$ and $(n+1) \cos (2n+1)^0$ so $\cos (2n+1)^0$ has one occurence except $\cos\, 1^0$ (which comes ones because it is 1st term) and $\cos\, 179^0$ is with - 90

now as $\cos\, 1^0 + \cos\, 179^0 = 0$
$\cos\, 3^0 + \cos\, 177^0 = 0$

so on so the so the sum is

$- 90\, \cos\, 181^0$

which is same as

$90\, \cos\, 1^0$

so sum of given terms = $90\, \cos\, 1^0 / \sin\, 1^0 = 90\, \cot\, 1^0$ and as there are 90 terms average = $\cot\,1^0$
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top