MHB Can You Prove This Number Theory Problem Involving Primes and Coprime Numbers?

AI Thread Summary
For coprime integers \(a\) and \(b\) and a prime \(p \neq 2\), it is proven that the greatest common divisor \(\left(a+b, \frac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}\right)\) can only be \(1\) or \(p\). If \(q\) is a prime divisor of \(a+b\), it cannot divide either \(a\) or \(b\) due to their coprimality. If \(q\) also divides \(\frac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}\), it leads to the conclusion that \(q\) must divide \(p\). Consequently, the only possible common divisors of \(a+b\) and \(\frac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}\) are \(1\) and \(p\). This establishes the relationship between the sums and their divisors in the context of prime numbers.
MountEvariste
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
1. For $(a,b) = 1$ and prime $p\ne 2$, prove that $\displaystyle \left(a+b, \frac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}\right) = 1$ or $p$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MountEvariste said:
1. For $(a,b) = 1$ and prime $p\ne 2$, prove that $\displaystyle \left(a+b, \frac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}\right) = 1$ or $p$.
[sp]If $q$ is a prime divisor of $a+b$ then $q$ cannot divide $a$ or $b$ (because $a$ and $b$ are coprime).

If $q$ is also a divisor of $\dfrac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}$ then $q$ divides $$\begin{aligned}\dfrac{a^p+b^p}{a+b} &= a^{p-1} - a^{p-2}b + a^{p-3}b^2 - \ldots + b^{p-1} \\ &= (a+b)\bigl(a^{p-2} -2a^{p-3}b + 3a^{p-4}b^2 - \ldots - (p-1)b^{p-2}\bigr) + pb^{p-1} .\end{aligned}$$ Therefore $q$ divides $pb^{p-1}$. But $q$ dnes not divide $b$, so it follows that $q$ divides $p$. Hence the only possible prime divisors of $a+b$ and $\dfrac{a^p+b^p}{a+b}$ (and consequently the only possible common divisors) are $1$ and $p$.
[/sp]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top