MHB Can you solve for y in sin(y) - y = x√(2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wheepep
  • Start date Start date
wheepep
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
sin(y) - y = x√(2)
solve for y
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What makes you think a closed-form solution for y can be found?
 
Replacing [math]sin(y)[/math] by [math]\frac{e^{iy}- e^{-iy}}{2i}[/math] you might be able to get a solution in terms of the "Lambert W function" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function.
 
Maybe there exists a closed form solution exists, maybe not... But could I ask, what is the purpose for searching such solution?

I know, in celestial mechanics, the Kepler equation is same as this - at least after a change of variables - which means, you can take a look at literature, if you find something about it. As being so, I wouldn't use my time to kick the equation, as it is one of the most researched one in the world. Unless I wanted some sort of challenge, of course.

Anyhow, your choices for the solution will most likely be an iterative method, a power series or a Fourier series or interpolation of the numerical solution over the values of x under interest.
 
In general, periodic functions are of interest due to their frequent occurrence in natural phenomenon. As speculation, this particular function may be of interest due the times and places it occurs.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top