How Do You Approach Unique Physics Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gokul43201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist Thinking
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unique physics problems presented in "Thinking Like a Physicist," a compilation of qualifier problems from the University of Bristol's Physics Department. Participants find these problems refreshing compared to standard texts like Irodov and Resnick. A notable example discussed involves estimating the radius of a planet formed from a dispersed collection of particles, requiring concepts such as gravitational potential energy, energy conservation, and specific heat. The conclusion drawn is that the radius calculated aligns with Earth's radius, leading to further exploration of gas giants if the planet exceeds this critical size.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy of a sphere
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles
  • Familiarity with specific heat concepts
  • Ability to make reasonable assumptions in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced problems in "Thinking Like a Physicist"
  • Study gravitational potential energy calculations in astrophysics
  • Learn about the formation and characteristics of gas giants
  • Investigate methods for making order of magnitude estimates in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in tackling unique and challenging physics problems that require creative problem-solving and conceptual understanding.

Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,207
Reaction score
25
Anyone worked on problems from "Thinking Like a Physicist" ? This is a compilation of qualifier problems from the University of Bristol (I think) Physics Dept. - very different from the standard physics problems you come across in texts like Irodov, Resnick, etc.

I found them quite refreshing !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any particular problem in the book you found mind boggling? (that makes you look like this:
:eek: ).
 
Most of the problems involve making order of magnitude estimates, using reasonable assumptions.

I think the first problem in the book went something like this :

"A widely dispersed collection of particles condense into a planet. If the planet's temperature is at its melting point, what is its radius ?"













Sweet and simple; the solution of this problem requires the application of just a few simple concepts (grav. PE of a sphere, energy conservation, specific heat). The important trick is deciding if a certain assumption is reasonable to make (neglect radiation, electrostatic PE).

If you solve the problem reasonably well, you find the radius of the planet to be of the order of Earth's radius. No surprise there - we do have a molten core. Then you ask yourself what would happen if the planet were much bigger than this critical radius - why, gas giants, of course !

Neat, wot ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
1K