revnaknuma
- 33
- 0
I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
is this unrealistic?
The discussion centers on the unrealistic aspiration of becoming "the best physicist of all time." Participants unanimously agree that this goal is counterproductive, emphasizing that physics is a collaborative field where contributions are made by many rather than a single individual. The conversation highlights the importance of pursuing physics for passion and discovery rather than for accolades. Notable physicists like Einstein, Bohr, and Heisenberg are referenced to illustrate the evolution of physics knowledge, indicating that significant contributions today are less likely due to the vast existing understanding of the field.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for aspiring physicists, educators in the field of science, and anyone interested in the philosophy of science and the nature of scientific achievement.
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
pergradus said:My goal is the be the worst physicist who still won a Nobel prize.
Think I can do it?
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
S_Happens said:You could start by limiting it to "best physicist that inhabits my body" and maybe eventually expand from there.
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times

revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?
revnaknuma said:I want to become the best physicist of all times.
is this unrealistic?