Can you watch a gamma-ray burst from the side?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Strato Incendus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma ray watch
AI Thread Summary
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) travel at light speed, meaning Earth would only see one upon impact, and none have been observed within the Milky Way yet. If a GRB occurred nearby but not directed at Earth, it could potentially be observed from the side, allowing astronomers to gauge its distance from a target planet. GRBs typically last seconds to minutes and their energy decreases as they travel, complicating visibility. Recent observations of a GRB directed towards Earth have provided insights into the burst's source and the physics involved, revealing expanding rings of X-ray light caused by dust clouds in the Milky Way. These observations enhance understanding of GRBs and their implications for the galaxy.
Strato Incendus
Messages
188
Reaction score
23
Since gamma-ray bursts travel at the speed of light, my state of knowledge is that, if one were to hit Earth, we would of course only see it the moment it hits us. Furthermore, to my knowledge, we haven’t observed any GRBs within the milky way yet.

However, what if there were a GRB within the milky way (i.e., much closer than the ones we’ve observed so far, in other galaxies) that wasn’t pointed at Earth, but instead, we were observing it from the side — could we watch it travel through space? For example, in order to see how far away it was from a solar system which it is going to hit at the end?

Since these bursts, as far as I know, last between a few seconds and one minute, I imagine the jet would already have “torn off” from its source. Meaning, there wouldn’t be an uninterrupted stream from the star / black hole that caused the burst all the way to the target. While the burst has already stopped at its source, its “point” should still be on its way. Basically, it should act like two arrows of light on their way, shot in opposite directions.

To my knowledge, gamma-ray bursts get wider the further they travel, like a cone shape. So the longer it travels, the easier it should be to see. Then again, the longer it travels, the further its energy should decrease, too — and, along with that, probably also its luminosity. Which in turn should then make it harder to see again.

So in short: With the telescopes on a spaceship, could you observe a gamma-ray burst from within the milky way from the side, in order to tell how far it is currently away from a planet it is going to hit in the future?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it is light, you can't see it from the side unless it penetrates a cloud of particles, and scattering occurs. It's like a flashlight beam showing the dust in the air at night as you view it from the side.

https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-2607977-specks-dust-floating-beam-light

Recent telescope observations did spot a gamma-ray burst that was directed toward us.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/...urst-ever-recorded-rattled-earths-atmosphere/

A GRB this close means that astronomers can analyze the light they see from it in more ways than usual. Typically a burst’s light isn’t bright enough to clearly reveal details about the event that caused it. This specimen could help scientists better understand the central black hole engine that forms during a burst and the extraordinarily complex nature of the physics surrounding it.

It can also tell us about the Milky Way. The Swift observatory saw expanding rings of x-ray light centered on the GRB’s location, caused by dust clouds in the Milky Way located roughly 600 to 12,000 light-years from Earth. These “light echoes” happen when light hits dust clouds just off our line of sight to the GRB—so we see them to the side, next to the bright point in the sky. Because of the short amount of extra time it takes light from the blast to reach those dust clouds and be scattered toward us, we see rings of light moving outward from the center, their expansion rate related to their distance from us. Measuring these rings allowed astronomers to determine the distances to the clouds.
 
  • Like
Likes Strato Incendus
Sorry for my late reply, but thanks a lot for your answer! I’m not quite sure yet if I’ll actually have a GRB go off within the time frame of my story, or if it will just remain eternally in the background, as an allegory for the permanent threat of extinction, without anyone knowing when exactly it will be.

But if the GRB does go off at some point during my story, know I have a better idea how I could describe it — from the point of view of an observer on the sidelines. :smile:
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top