Gamma ray bursts (GRB) and distribution of life

In summary, the article discusses the potential impact of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) on the prevalence of life in the galaxy. Using recent data on GRB rates, luminosity, and host galaxies, the authors estimate the likelihood of a lethal GRB occurring in the past 5 billion years and causing mass extinctions. The results suggest that the inner Milky Way is not hospitable to life due to a higher probability of lethal GRBs, while the safest environments are in the outer regions of large galaxies. The authors also mention the relevance of GRBs to the Fermi Paradox and the early development of life on Earth. They also address the question of GRB beaming and its potential impact on extinction events. Overall, the article highlights
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
Gammaray bursts (GRB) may affect the prevalence of life in various different regions of the galaxy.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2506
On the role of GRBs on life extinction in the Universe
Tsvi Piran, Raul Jimenez
(Submitted on 8 Sep 2014)
As a copious source of gamma-rays, a nearby Galactic Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) can be a threat to life. Using recent determinations of the rate of GRBs, their luminosity function and properties of their host galaxies, we estimate the probability that a life-threatening (lethal) GRB would take place. Amongst the different kinds of GRBs, long ones are most dangerous. There is a very good chance (but no certainty) that at least one lethal GRB took place during the past 5 Gyr close enough to Earth as to significantly damage life. There is a 50% chance that such a lethal GRB took place during the last 500 Myr causing one of the major mass extinction events. Assuming that a similar level of radiation would be lethal to life on other exoplanets hosting life, we explore the potential effects of GRBs to life elsewhere in the Galaxy and the Universe. We find that the probability of a lethal GRB is much larger in the inner Milky Way (95% within a radius of 4 kpc from the galactic center), making it inhospitable to life. Only at the outskirts of the Milky Way, at more than 10 kpc from the galactic center, this probability drops below 50%. When considering the Universe as a whole, the safest environments for life (similar to the one on Earth) are the lowest density regions in the outskirts of large galaxies and life can exist in only ~ 10% of galaxies. Remarkably, a cosmological constant is essential for such systems to exist. Furthermore, because of both the higher GRB rate and galaxies being smaller, life as it exists on Earth could not take place at z>0.5. Early life forms must have been much more resilient to radiation.
6 pages, 4 figures.

Tsvi Piran has impressed me over the years as being a very able researcher in a broad range of subjects. I am not sure I can always follow his reasoning (e.g. about the cosmological constant in this case) but still want to pay attention. Maybe other people an provide some comment and perspective on this.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I always wonder how relevant GRB beaming/alignment with jets is to the probability of an extinction level event on life bearing planets. I'm sure this was taken into account by Piran, but, still seems like a reasonable question.
 
  • #3
This is an interest of mine. Thank you for the link.
 
  • #4
Was going to post on this & found this topic - the relevance is that this is hopeful news in regards to the Fermi Paradox, i.e. a past period of GRBs plus galactic geography is the great filter

have not read the paper, but this synopsis (http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/124) mentions that GRBs may have made much of the Universe unfriendly to life until about 5 billion years ago. So that would a) make us an early intelligent species and b) eliminate a huge chunk of the current galaxy as a potential home for other intelligent species
 
  • #5
The early Earth with life did not even have such a layer (or molecular oxygen in the atmosphere at all), so this is applicable to more recent developments (in particular, land-based life) only.

How can a GRB destroy the 50% of ozone that are shielded by Earth?
 
  • #6
Agreed mfb, the Earth did not even have significant oxygen content much before a couple gy ago, so the question is moot.
 

1. What are gamma ray bursts (GRB)?

Gamma ray bursts (GRB) are powerful bursts of gamma rays, the most energetic form of electromagnetic radiation. They are the brightest and most energetic events in the universe, and can last from a few milliseconds to several minutes.

2. How are GRBs formed?

GRBs are believed to be the result of massive stars collapsing and forming a black hole, or the collision of two neutron stars. As the matter falls into the black hole or is ejected during the collision, immense amounts of energy in the form of gamma rays are released.

3. Can GRBs impact Earth and life on it?

Yes, GRBs can potentially impact Earth and life on it. However, the likelihood of a GRB occurring in our galaxy and directly hitting Earth is very low. The atmosphere and magnetic field of Earth also provide some protection from the harmful effects of gamma rays.

4. Are there any known effects of GRBs on life in the universe?

There is no direct evidence of GRBs having a significant impact on life in the universe. However, some scientists have hypothesized that GRBs could be responsible for mass extinctions on other planets, if they were to occur nearby.

5. Is there a correlation between the distribution of life and the occurrence of GRBs?

There is currently no known correlation between the distribution of life and the occurrence of GRBs. Some studies have suggested that regions with a higher frequency of GRBs may have a lower likelihood of life due to the potential for harmful effects, but this is still a topic of ongoing research.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
502
Replies
9
Views
803
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top