Gamma ray bursts (GRB) and distribution of life

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,770
790
Gammaray bursts (GRB) may affect the prevalence of life in various different regions of the galaxy.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2506
On the role of GRBs on life extinction in the Universe
Tsvi Piran, Raul Jimenez
(Submitted on 8 Sep 2014)
As a copious source of gamma-rays, a nearby Galactic Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) can be a threat to life. Using recent determinations of the rate of GRBs, their luminosity function and properties of their host galaxies, we estimate the probability that a life-threatening (lethal) GRB would take place. Amongst the different kinds of GRBs, long ones are most dangerous. There is a very good chance (but no certainty) that at least one lethal GRB took place during the past 5 Gyr close enough to Earth as to significantly damage life. There is a 50% chance that such a lethal GRB took place during the last 500 Myr causing one of the major mass extinction events. Assuming that a similar level of radiation would be lethal to life on other exoplanets hosting life, we explore the potential effects of GRBs to life elsewhere in the Galaxy and the Universe. We find that the probability of a lethal GRB is much larger in the inner Milky Way (95% within a radius of 4 kpc from the galactic center), making it inhospitable to life. Only at the outskirts of the Milky Way, at more than 10 kpc from the galactic center, this probability drops below 50%. When considering the Universe as a whole, the safest environments for life (similar to the one on Earth) are the lowest density regions in the outskirts of large galaxies and life can exist in only ~ 10% of galaxies. Remarkably, a cosmological constant is essential for such systems to exist. Furthermore, because of both the higher GRB rate and galaxies being smaller, life as it exists on Earth could not take place at z>0.5. Early life forms must have been much more resilient to radiation.
6 pages, 4 figures.

Tsvi Piran has impressed me over the years as being a very able researcher in a broad range of subjects. I am not sure I can always follow his reasoning (e.g. about the cosmological constant in this case) but still want to pay attention. Maybe other people an provide some comment and perspective on this.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,435
747
I always wonder how relevant GRB beaming/alignment with jets is to the probability of an extinction level event on life bearing planets. I'm sure this was taken into account by Piran, but, still seems like a reasonable question.
 
  • #3
vociferous
248
6
This is an interest of mine. Thank you for the link.
 
  • #4
BWV
1,196
1,308
Was going to post on this & found this topic - the relevance is that this is hopeful news in regards to the Fermi Paradox, i.e. a past period of GRBs plus galactic geography is the great filter

have not read the paper, but this synopsis (http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/124) mentions that GRBs may have made much of the Universe unfriendly to life until about 5 billion years ago. So that would a) make us an early intelligent species and b) eliminate a huge chunk of the current galaxy as a potential home for other intelligent species
 
  • #5
36,098
13,015
The early Earth with life did not even have such a layer (or molecular oxygen in the atmosphere at all), so this is applicable to more recent developments (in particular, land-based life) only.

How can a GRB destroy the 50% of ozone that are shielded by Earth?
 
  • #6
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,435
747
Agreed mfb, the earth did not even have significant oxygen content much before a couple gy ago, so the question is moot.
 

Suggested for: Gamma ray bursts (GRB) and distribution of life

Replies
0
Views
352
Replies
5
Views
71
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
295
Replies
2
Views
600
Replies
17
Views
440
Replies
7
Views
712
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
825
Replies
1
Views
230
Top