Can't find that on the dictionary

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter go quantum!
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of covariance in the context of Dirac's equation and its classification as a relativistic equation. Participants explore the implications of covariance in differential equations, particularly in relation to transformations under the relativistic symmetry group.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the meaning of Dirac's equation being described as a covariant relativistic equation.
  • Another participant explains that "covariant" typically relates to Minkowski space, while "relativistic equation" refers to differential equations that transform under the relativistic symmetry group.
  • A participant clarifies that if a solution f(x) exists, then f(Tx) is also a solution, where T represents a Lorentz transformation.
  • It is noted that f(Tx) being a solution applies only if f is a scalar function; for fields with nonzero spin, a different transformation involving matrix elements of a representation of the symmetry group is required.
  • A request for an example of the transformation matrix P is made, alongside a contextual note about the participant's work on Dirac's equation for a course on Symmetry Groups in Physics.
  • Another participant poses a question about the covariant equation obeyed by the electromagnetic potential in different frames of coordinates and the relationship between the potentials in those frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of covariance and its implications for different types of equations, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of transformations and the definitions of covariance and relativistic equations, which may not be universally agreed upon.

go quantum!
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Why do people mean when they say that Dirac's equation is a covariant relativistic equation?
Thank you for dedicating your time helping me and anyone who finds this question useful for his life.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, <covariant> usually means 'Minkowski space related', <relativistic equation> means a differential equation with variables (unknown) transforming in a known way under the relativistic symmetry group of the theory.

For example, the field equations of the electromagnetic field written in terms of E and B are said to be noncovariant, while written in terms of the e-m 2-form field, they are covariant, as the 2-form field can be somehow (in a very complicated manner though) related to the geometry of the flat Minkowski space-time.
 
In other words, you mean we are at the presence of a differential equation which as the following property. If we find a solution f(x), then f(Tx) is also a solution where by T I mean a lorentz transformation.

Did I get it right?
 
It's actually more. f(Tx) is a solution, only if f is a scalar function. if 'f' describes fields with nonzero spin angular momentum, Pf(Tx) is also a solution of the transformed equation, where P describes the matrix elements of some finite dimensional representation of the global symmetry group of the space-time manifold.
 
Would you give me an exemple for P?
Maybe I should contextualize what I am working on. I am doing a memoir about Dirac's equation for the course Symmetry Groups in Physics.
 
Well, think if the e-m potential. What covariant equation would it obey in one frame of coordinates ? What about another frame ? How would the 2 potentials in the 2 frames be related ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K