General Concepts About Fermi-Dirac Distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between Pauli's exclusion principle and the Fermi-Dirac distribution within the context of quantum statistical mechanics. Participants explore the implications of these concepts, particularly in systems with degeneracy, and how they affect the occupancy of quantum states by fermions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the Fermi-Dirac distribution provides the expectation value of the number of electrons across all quantum states with a given energy, rather than indicating a fixed number of electrons in a specific state.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of states with the same energy, where some participants argue that it is possible to have multiple states occupied by different electrons, while others suggest that the average number of electrons in a state must remain consistent with the Fermi-Dirac distribution.
  • One participant notes that the average number of particles in a given state can range from 0 to 1, emphasizing the probabilistic nature of occupancy in statistical physics.
  • Another participant points out that the Fermi-Dirac formula must be adjusted for systems with degeneracy, indicating that the expectation value of particle number should be multiplied by the degree of degeneracy.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the original poster's confusion stems from misunderstanding the implications of degeneracy in relation to the occupancy of states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of degeneracy and the occupancy of quantum states. While some agree on the necessity of adjusting the Fermi-Dirac distribution for degeneracy, others debate the interpretation of occupancy in relation to the Pauli exclusion principle. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made about degeneracy and the specific conditions under which the Fermi-Dirac distribution applies. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in distinguishing between states and particles in quantum mechanics.

MartinCort
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello!
Thanks for your time reading my questions.
When I was studying quantum statistical mechanics, I get so confused about the relations between Pauli's exclusion principle and the Fermi-Dirac distributions.
1. The Pauli's exclusion principle says that: Two fermions can't occupy the same quantum states.
2. The Fermi-Dirac distribution tells how many electrons there are in one quantum state with Energy E_i

Is there any possibility that we find a system, which has 2 degeneracy(for example) satisfying both of the requirements?
If so how do we interpret the Fermi-Dirac distribution in this case, because we know when E=E_i, there are two particles, but from the Fermi-Dirac distribution, the average number will be 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MartinCort said:
The Fermi-Dirac distribution tells how many electrons there are in one quantum state with Energy E_i

No. The Fermi-Dirac distribution tells how many electrons there are (more precisely, the expectation value of electron number) when aggregated over all of the quantum states that have energy ##E_i##. There might well be more than one such state.

MartinCort said:
we know when E=E_i, there are two particles

No, you don't. You know there are two states with energy ##E_i## (because you stipulated that in your hypothetical), but you don't know that there are electrons occupying both of those states.
 
PeterDonis said:
No. The Fermi-Dirac distribution tells how many electrons there are (more precisely, the expectation value of electron number) when aggregated over all of the quantum states that have energy ##E_i##. There might well be more than one such state.
No, you don't. You know there are two states with energy ##E_i## (because you stipulated that in your hypothetical), but you don't know that there are electrons occupying both of those states.

Hello Peter
Thanks for your explanation!

Can I understand this as follow?

It is possible to have two states A and B with the same energy, but we can not say that there is an electron in state A while there is another electron in state B. So the number of electrons will still be one which is consistent with the Fermi-Dirac distribution.

However, Would you mind elucidating why it is not allowed?

Thanks!
 
MartinCort said:
It is possible to have two states A and B with the same energy, but we can not say that there is an electron in state A while there is another electron in state B.

No, that's not correct. The Pauli exclusion principle only says you can't have two fermions in the same state--so there can't be two electrons both in state A, or two electrons both in state B. But there is nothing stopping one electron being in state A and another electron in state B.

MartinCort said:
So the number of electrons will still be one which is consistent with the Fermi-Dirac distribution.

Why do you think the number of electrons has to be one if there are two states, A and B?
 
MartinCort said:
When I was studying quantum statistical mechanics, I get so confused about the relations between Pauli's exclusion principle and the Fermi-Dirac distributions.
(1) The Pauli's exclusion principle says that: Two fermions can't occupy the same quantum states.
(2) The Fermi-Dirac distribution tells how many electrons there are in one quantum state with Energy E_i
According to (1), the number of particles in a given state is either 0 or 1. But statistical physics assigns probabilities to those two possibilities, meaning that the average number of particles in a given state can be any real number in the interval [0,1]. According to (2), this average number is something like
$$\frac{1}{e^{\beta E}+1}$$
The crucial thing here is that we have the term +1 (not -1 as in the Bose-Einstein distribution), which provides that this number indeed cannot be larger than 1.
 
Demystifier said:
this average number is

Note that this formula assumes no degeneracy. If there is degeneracy, the formula you give has to be multiplied by the degree of degeneracy to give the expectation value of particle number for energy ##E##.
 
PeterDonis said:
Note that this formula assumes no degeneracy. If there is degeneracy, the formula you give has to be multiplied by the degree of degeneracy to give the expectation value of particle number for energy ##E##.
Of course, but it seemed to me that this is not what confused the OP.
 
Demystifier said:
it seemed to me that this is not what confused the OP.

On the contrary, I think that is exactly what confused the OP; he is asking about a system with degeneracy but appears to believe that the number of particles with energy ##E## can't be more than 1 even if there is degeneracy (multiple states with the same energy ##E##). See my post #4, and the portion of post #3 that I responded to there.
 
PeterDonis said:
On the contrary, I think that is exactly what confused the OP; he is asking about a system with degeneracy but appears to believe that the number of particles with energy ##E## can't be more than 1 even if there is degeneracy (multiple states with the same energy ##E##). See my post #4, and the portion of post #3 that I responded to there.
When I read it again, I see that you are right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K