How Do Electrons Behave in a Half-Filled P Orbital?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the behavior of electrons in half-filled p orbitals, emphasizing that electrons do not occupy distinct lobes but rather exist in a probability density across both lobes. It is established that the probability density vanishes at the nodal plane, but this does not imply that electrons cannot be found in either lobe. Experimental evidence supports that both electrons in a p orbital can be found in either lobe simultaneously, with their spins oriented orthogonally. The concept of charge density distribution is crucial in understanding this behavior, as it reflects the symmetrical nature of the orbital.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of atomic orbitals and their shapes
  • Knowledge of probability density functions in quantum systems
  • Familiarity with electron spin and Pauli exclusion principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on electron configurations
  • Study the mathematical formulation of probability density in quantum mechanics
  • Explore experimental techniques used to observe electron behavior in orbitals
  • Learn about the role of Coulomb repulsion in multi-electron systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, atomic structure, and electron behavior in chemical bonding.

DiracPool
Messages
1,242
Reaction score
514
I recently have been studying how the SE solutions produce orbitals in the atom. I understand that we are not to think of these classically as actual orbits, however, I am looking for a little clarification on a couple things. For one, it is relatively easy to see how two electrons may share a 1s spherical orbital. But what about a p orbital? Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.

I know that this is QM and that we are supposed to allow for these counterintuitive things to happen, but has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one? In addition, are there any experiments that tell us whether two electrons filling a p orbital can be found in either lobe? Or that both can be found in one lobe at the same time and not the other? I’m guessing that if measurements have found that both electrons demonstrating opposite spins have an equal probability of being in either lobe at any given time, then I’ll have to accept that. I’m just looking for a less counterintuitive solution or visualization.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, there is no way to tell if two electrons are the same or different, other than measuring both positions at the same time. Most measurements look at a time-averaged charge density.

One can calculate the position of one electron in the frame where the other electron is at 0,0,0. I expect it's a numerical mess, and I suspect that most of the time it is in the other lobe, but not always.
 
"After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two."
Be careful. This is a probability density, not a probability. The prob. density vanishes only in a set of measure zero, so your intuitive picture is not really mathematically well-defined. I think.
If you have two electrons in the same p-Orbital, each has the same probability density (ignoring the complication of Coulomb repulsion between the electrons).
BTw, it's the same with the higher s-Orbitals - they all have radius values where psi vanishes.
 
Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.
No, as you say the orbital represents the probability of finding the electron at a particular point. The fact that it vanishes at z = 0 simply means that you won't ever find it at z = 0. But you can find it on either side - the electron does not have a continuous orbital motion, and therefore does not have to transition from one lobe to the other. It can be found in either lobe.
has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one?
It don't zip, it just sits there! :smile: No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.
 
It don't zip, it just sits there! No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.

So, would it be accurate to say that a single electron in a p-orbital is not zipping around the orbital? It just simply occupies both lobes with a charge density distributed according to the probability density? And then when a second electron comes around the first electron simply accommodates it through both electrons mutually orienting their "spins" orthogonally to one another (however that trick may be manifested)?

In that scenario, then, I would assume that both electrons occupy both lobes of the orbital with a relatively equal charge density distribution distinguished only by some spin factor? Again, in that scenario, is there any way to distinguish one electron from the other, i.e., is there some inhomogeneity of the charge density distributions that may distinguish one electron from the other? Or, is there no way to distinguish them and we simply say that two electrons share this orbital with opposite spins and that's about all we can say about it?
 
"that's about all we can say about it?"
Yup
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K