Can't prove generalized De Morgan's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter john562
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    generalized Law
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 8K views
john562
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let B be a non-empty set, and supose that {Sa : a[tex]\in[/tex]B} is an B- indexed family of subsets of a set S. Then we have,
([tex]\cup[/tex] a\in B Sa)c = [tex]\bigcap<sub>a\in B</sub>[/tex] Sac.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to show that the two were both subsets of each other, but I'm not sure how to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose [tex]a\in \bigcap S_\alpha^c[/tex]. Then a is in all the sets [tex]S_\alpha ^c[/tex], and so it is not contained in any of [tex]S_\alpha[/tex]. Therefore, it is not contained in their union (by definition). It is therefore contained in union's complement.

Suppose a is in union's complement. No [tex]S_\alpha[/tex] contains a, so all the [tex]S_\alpha^c[/tex]'s contain a. Therefore, a is in their intersection.