Cantor-schroder-bernstein use in proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaqueh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
jaqueh
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the berstein theorem to show: if A[itex]\subseteq[/itex]ℝ and there exists an open interval (a,b) such that (a,b)[itex]\subseteq[/itex]A, then the cardinal number of A=ℂ


Homework Equations


The theorem states that if card(A)≤card(B) and card(B)≤card(A), then card(A)=card(B)


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what is relevant and what the open interval (a,b) implies. I know that (a,b) is a subset of ℝ and its equivalent to ℂ, but i don't know if I am supposed to prove that or what I am supposed to do at all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I never used this theorem before, but I think I understand why it is used. Do you have any theorems that relate subsets to cardinalities? If [itex]A \subset B[/itex], then card(A) ? card(B).
 
yes if a subset b then card(a)≤card(b), aka there exists an F:A-(1-1)->B
 
Okay, good. I think this proof is pretty easy now, right?

You have [itex](a,b) \subseteq A[/itex], so what is true about their cardinalities? You already told us that card((a,b)) is the continuum.

You also have [itex]A \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex], so what is true about their cardnalities?

I think at this point you can apply the theorem to get your final line of the proof!
 
well i guess c=(a,b) ≤ A and A≤ R=c , but can i assume that (a,b) is equal to c?
 
jaqueh said:
I know that (a,b) is a subset of ℝ and its equivalent to ℂ, but i don't know if I am supposed to prove that or what I am supposed to do at all

I thought when you stated this line that you knew card((a,b)) is the continuum. Did you not prove this in a theorem yet? It turns out that card((a,b)) is the continuum, but if you didn't prove that, you might need to take a different approach.

In real analysis, that fact was one of the first thing we proved involving cardnalities, so I would assume you have that at your disposal?
 
i don't have that at my disposal because this is just a proof writing class, i don't know how i would prove that (a,b) is the continuum using what i know though. that is the main bit that is confusing me