Prove sets are equipotent using Schroder - Bernstein

  • Thread starter Thread starter fk378
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equipotency of two sets using the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Specifically, it addresses the cardinality of the unit disc A={(x,y) in R²: x² + y² < 1} and the unit square B={(x,y) in R²: x,y in [-1,1]}, as well as the unit disc A and the entire plane B=R². The proposed mappings include using the identity function for g and a scaling function for f, such as f(x,y) = (x/2, y/2) for the first case, and a more complex function for the second case that maintains injectivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem
  • Knowledge of injective functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates in R²
  • Basic concepts of set theory and cardinality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of injective functions in set theory
  • Study the implications of the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem in different contexts
  • Explore examples of cardinality proofs in mathematics
  • Learn about mappings between different dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in set theory and cardinality proofs, particularly those studying advanced topics in mathematical logic and analysis.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem, prove the following sets must have the same cardinality by producing explicit one-to-one (but not necessarily surjective) maps f: A-->B and g: B-->A.

(a) The unit disc in the plane A={(x,y) in R2: x^2 + y^2 <1} and the unit square B={(x,y) in R2: x,y in [-1,1]}.

(b) The unit disc in the plane A={(x,y) in R2: x^2 + y^2 <1} and the entire plane B=R2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble with this section we're working on because I don't know how to come up with an injective function at the top of my head.

For (a) the map g, can I use the map (x,y)-->(x^2 + y^2)/2?

For (b) the map g, can I use the map (x,y)-->(x^2+y^2)/(x^2+y^2)+1?

You can probably tell I am lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, of course those don't work:
1) because of the squares, neither of those is one to one.
2) you need two functions, f and g, for each.
3) those are functions from R2 to R, not R2 to R2.

My first thought. for (a), since the unit disk is already inside the unit square, you can take g to be the identity map: g((x,y))= (x,y). To go the other way "reduce" the size of the unit square so it is inside the unit dist: first map (x,y) to (x/2, y/2), then use the identity map: in other words, use f(x,y)= (x/2, y/2).


For (b) you can again use g((x,y))= (x,y). For f, dividing by x2+ y2+ 1 is good but you must have 2[/sup] components and the function must be one to one. There is an almost trivial choice for the numerators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K