Capacitance, unbalanced wheatstone.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suraj M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance across points A and B in an unbalanced Wheatstone bridge circuit. The user derived relationships between charges q₁, q₂, and q₃ using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and arrived at the formula for capacitance, \( C_{AB} = \frac{155}{23} \, \mu F \). The importance of using charge instead of current and ensuring the net charge at junctions Q and T is zero is emphasized. The necessity of applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) is also highlighted for accurate analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Knowledge of capacitance calculation using \( C = \frac{Q}{V} \)
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution in capacitors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in circuit analysis
  • Explore advanced capacitance calculations in complex circuits
  • Learn about charge distribution in capacitors and their implications
  • Review examples of unbalanced Wheatstone bridge circuits and their analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone studying capacitor behavior in unbalanced circuits will benefit from this discussion.

Suraj M
Gold Member
Messages
596
Reaction score
39

Homework Statement


WIN_20150527_141946.JPG

Find capacitance across AB
So i divided the current into q1 and q2 as shown. then i assumed that q₂>q₁.

Homework Equations


##C=\frac{Q}{V}##
I don't know anything after KVL KCL and loop law.

The Attempt at a Solution


So i split the current at T into q₃ and q₂-q₃
by the diagram, i used Loop law for UPQTU and QRSTQ.
this gave me a relation between q₁,q₂ and q₃.
i got
$$ q₁= 15q₃$$
$$q₂=16q₃$$
$$q₁ = \frac{15}{16} q₂$$
using these, i used the equation..
$$ C_{AB} = \frac{q₂ +q₁}{\frac{q₁}{5} + \frac{10}{q₁+q₃}}$$
so i got $$C_{AB} = \frac{155}{23} µF$$
Is this right.? because i doubt it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You work with charges instead of currents. The net charge should be zero at junctions Q and T.
 
can't we do it by this method? KCL necessary? I will try.
 
Suraj M said:
can't we do it by this method? KCL necessary? I will try.
You can, but write charge instead of current. And take into account that the net charge on the connected plates is zero, and the charges on the opposite plates of a capacitor are of opposite sign.

Show your work in detail. Otherwise I can not decide if you got the correct result or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
865
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K