Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the carbon-silver-carbon angle in the complex ion [Ag(CN)2]−, exploring its geometry and bonding characteristics. Participants examine whether the structure is ionic or covalent and how this affects the angle.
Discussion Character
- Homework-related, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant claims the carbon-silver-carbon angle is 180 degrees but questions the reasoning behind this, suggesting confusion about the nature of the complex ion.
- Another participant references external sources, suggesting that understanding 'cyanide' and 'p orbital' may provide valuable information regarding the geometry.
- A different participant cites a source stating that dicyanides are linear in geometry, questioning how the bonding leads to a 180-degree angle if the ligands are bonded to the metal ion.
- One participant clarifies that the bond between the CN− ions and the Ag+ ion is covalent, asserting that [Ag(CN)2]− is a coordination complex, which may influence the angle.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the nature of the bonding in [Ag(CN)2]− and its geometric implications, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Contextual Notes
Participants have not reached a consensus on the bonding type (ionic vs. covalent) or its implications for the geometry of the complex ion.