MHB Cartesian Product of Non-Real Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Product
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have the sets $A=\left\{2,3\right\}$ and $B=\left\{5\right\}$, then $A$ X $B$ is defined as $\left\{(x,y)|x \in A, y\in B\right\}=\left\{(2,5), (3,5)\right\}$. But what happens when $A$ contains elements that are not in $\Bbb{R}$?

Example:
$A=\left\{(2,3),(3,4)\right\}\subset \Bbb{R}^2$ and $B=\left\{(3,2,5)\right\}\subset \Bbb{R}^3$, then following the same definition as above, we have $A$ X $B=\left\{((2,3),(3,2,5)), ((3,4),(3,2,5))\right\}$, but my book tells me that $A$ X $B$ should have elements in $\Bbb{R}^5$. Did I make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rido12,

You haven't made a mistake. Your elements belong to $\Bbb R^5$: $((2,3), (3,2,5)) = (2,3,3,2,5)$ and $((3,4),(3,2,5)) = (3,4,3,2,5)$.
 
Hey Rido! (Happy)

Strictly speaking they are not the same, but they are isomorphic (literally meaning same shape with symbol ≅).

Note that:
$$\mathbb R^2 \times \mathbb R^3 = (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R) \times (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R)
≅ \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R
= \mathbb R^5
$$
Anyway, it boils down to the same thing and the distinction is often not made.
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Rido! (Happy)

Strictly speaking they are not the same, but they are isomorphic (literally meaning same shape with symbol ≅).

Note that:
$$\mathbb R^2 \times \mathbb R^3 = (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R) \times (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R)
≅ \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R
= \mathbb R^5
$$
Anyway, it boils down to the same thing and the distinction is often not made.

Thanks for making this note. I assumed that in the book, a tuple made of up an $m$-tuple and an $n$-tuple is an $(m + n)$-tuple. However, that needs to be made explicitly clear in the text, for otherwise we consider them as different objects.
 
Hey ILS and Euge,

Thanks for clarifying my confusion! That is interesting to know. :D
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top