Cartesian Product of Non-Real Sets

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cartesian product of non-real sets can be understood through the example of sets A and B, where A contains elements from $\mathbb{R}^2$ and B from $\mathbb{R}^3$. Specifically, A = {(2,3), (3,4)} and B = {(3,2,5)} results in A X B = {((2,3),(3,2,5)), ((3,4),(3,2,5))}, which can be represented in $\mathbb{R}^5$ as (2,3,3,2,5) and (3,4,3,2,5). The distinction between tuples and their isomorphic representations in higher dimensions is crucial for accurate mathematical interpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Familiarity with vector spaces, specifically $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$
  • Knowledge of isomorphism in mathematics
  • Basic comprehension of tuples and their dimensional representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cartesian products in higher dimensions
  • Learn about isomorphic structures in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of tuples in multi-dimensional spaces
  • Investigate the formal definitions of vector spaces and their operations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced set theory and vector space concepts will benefit from this discussion.

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have the sets $A=\left\{2,3\right\}$ and $B=\left\{5\right\}$, then $A$ X $B$ is defined as $\left\{(x,y)|x \in A, y\in B\right\}=\left\{(2,5), (3,5)\right\}$. But what happens when $A$ contains elements that are not in $\Bbb{R}$?

Example:
$A=\left\{(2,3),(3,4)\right\}\subset \Bbb{R}^2$ and $B=\left\{(3,2,5)\right\}\subset \Bbb{R}^3$, then following the same definition as above, we have $A$ X $B=\left\{((2,3),(3,2,5)), ((3,4),(3,2,5))\right\}$, but my book tells me that $A$ X $B$ should have elements in $\Bbb{R}^5$. Did I make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rido12,

You haven't made a mistake. Your elements belong to $\Bbb R^5$: $((2,3), (3,2,5)) = (2,3,3,2,5)$ and $((3,4),(3,2,5)) = (3,4,3,2,5)$.
 
Hey Rido! (Happy)

Strictly speaking they are not the same, but they are isomorphic (literally meaning same shape with symbol ≅).

Note that:
$$\mathbb R^2 \times \mathbb R^3 = (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R) \times (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R)
≅ \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R
= \mathbb R^5
$$
Anyway, it boils down to the same thing and the distinction is often not made.
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Rido! (Happy)

Strictly speaking they are not the same, but they are isomorphic (literally meaning same shape with symbol ≅).

Note that:
$$\mathbb R^2 \times \mathbb R^3 = (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R) \times (\mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R)
≅ \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R \times \mathbb R
= \mathbb R^5
$$
Anyway, it boils down to the same thing and the distinction is often not made.

Thanks for making this note. I assumed that in the book, a tuple made of up an $m$-tuple and an $n$-tuple is an $(m + n)$-tuple. However, that needs to be made explicitly clear in the text, for otherwise we consider them as different objects.
 
Hey ILS and Euge,

Thanks for clarifying my confusion! That is interesting to know. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K