Casimir Effect, what does (x,θ) mean?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epislon58
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casimir effect Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation used in the paper regarding the transition from Cartesian to polar coordinates in the context of the Casimir Effect. Specifically, the notation (x, φ) is questioned, with participants suggesting it should be (r, φ) to align with standard polar coordinate representation. The reference to equation (3.24) indicates a consistent application of this coordinate transformation throughout the paper, reinforcing the argument that the radial coordinate is indeed denoted as x in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their representation.
  • Familiarity with the Casimir Effect and its mathematical formulations.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation and transformations.
  • Ability to interpret academic papers in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the mathematical derivation of the Casimir Effect in academic literature.
  • Study the use of polar coordinates in physics, focusing on transformations.
  • Examine the implications of notation changes in scientific papers.
  • Explore additional resources on mathematical notation in theoretical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of the Casimir Effect and coordinate transformations.

epislon58
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello look at (3.24). Above it, it states "We make the same switch to polar coordinates (x, φ) in the (x, y) plane, and substitute y ≡
(ax/nπ):"

Should (x, φ) be (r, φ)? Is this a typo?

Thank you.

http://aphyr.com/data/journals/113/comps.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
epislon58 said:
Hello look at (3.24). Above it, it states "We make the same switch to polar coordinates (x, φ) in the (x, y) plane, and substitute y ≡
(ax/nπ):"
Note he says the same switch. That's a clue, isn't it, that earlier in the paper he did the same thing? :wink:

I believe you'll find that in both places what he did was change to polar coordinates (x, y) → (r, φ) and then call the radial coordinate x.
 
thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K