Casimir effect, where is the energy loss?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Casimir effect and its implications for energy conservation. Participants explore the nature of energy changes when two plates are brought together due to the effect, questioning where energy loss occurs in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about energy conservation in the context of the Casimir effect, questioning how energy is created when the plates move closer together.
  • Another participant suggests that energy was initially added to the system to separate the plates, implying that the energy is returned when the plates move closer due to the Casimir effect.
  • There is a discussion about the analogy of weights connected by a spring, where energy is stored as potential energy when the spring is stretched, and this energy is released when the weights are allowed to move.
  • Some participants argue that energy is simply being converted or used rather than created, emphasizing that work must be done to separate the plates against the attractive forces acting on them.
  • One participant asserts that the discussion is fundamentally about classical physics principles of forces and energy conservation, rather than quantum mechanics or the specifics of the Casimir effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether energy is created or merely converted in the process of moving the plates. There is no consensus on the interpretation of energy conservation in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference classical physics principles, but the discussion does not delve into the quantum mechanical aspects of the Casimir effect, leaving some assumptions and definitions unexamined.

ArthurDent
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Firstly my knowledge of science is armchair tv level so any overly complicated explanations will be lost on me.

What is going on it terms energy conservation with the casimir effect.

As I understand it virtual particles created outside the plates have a greater range of wavelengths than those in the gap causing a pressure that pushes the plates together. But if the plates move then work is done and energy has been created, since you can't create energy where is the loss in this process to balance things out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ArthurDent said:
But if the plates move then work is done and energy has been created, since you can't create energy where is the loss in this process to balance things out?

Someone had to put the two plates in their initial separated positions, and that required adding energy to the system; we're just getting that energy back when the plates move closer.

Suppose I show you two weights connected by a stretched spring. When I let go of the weights, the spring pulls them together, doing work. Where did that energy come from? It came from the work I did stretching the spring in the first place; it was already there as potential energy when I first showed you the experimental setup.
 
I'm not sure I understand your answer.

Nugatory said:
Someone had to put the two plates in their initial separated positions, and that required adding energy to the system; we're just getting that energy back when the plates move closer.

Why would you need to add energy to the system to put the plates into position?
As I see it you're just converting/using existing energy to move the plates into position.

Nugatory said:
Suppose I show you two weights connected by a stretched spring. When I let go of the weights, the spring pulls them together, doing work. Where did that energy come from? It came from the work I did stretching the spring in the first place; it was already there as potential energy when I first showed you the experimental setup.

I kind of get the idea that its recovering the amount of energy needed to overcome the plates gravitational attraction in order to push them apart. Is this what you mean?
 
ArthurDent said:
I'm not sure I understand your answer.
Why would you need to add energy to the system to put the plates into position?
As I see it you're just converting/using existing energy to move the plates into position.
Suppose I start with the two plates touching. If there's a force that draws them together then I cannot get the system into the plates-separated state without doing work, which shows up as an increase in the potential energy as I separate the plates to set up your initial condition. And if I start with the plates widely separated and bring them closer to set up the experiment, then the potential energy was there all along. Either way, energy conversation works out.

I kind of get the idea that its recovering the amount of energy needed to overcome the plates gravitational attraction in order to push them apart. Is this what you mean?
Pretty much, yes.
None of this has anything to do with quantum mechanics or the Casimir effect; it's just how forces, potential energy, and energy conservation work in ordinary classical physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K