Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams

In summary, Homework Statement:You are required to solve for the horizontal and vertical deflections of a semi-circular cantilever, taking into account both bending moments and axial loads.
  • #1
robip
12
0

Homework Statement



You have a semi-circular cantilever with a point radial load at its free end.
i.e load acting down from top of semi circle, with bottom attached to something.

Calculate the equations for the horizontal and vertical deflections taking into account both bending moments and axial loads using castiglianos theorem

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I gave it a go and compared it to some experimental data and found I was a bit off.

I got dV=LR^3/2EI
with L = load
R = Radius
E = Youngs Modulus
I = moment of inertia bh^3/12
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You could show your attempt so we can determine where you went wrong.
 
  • #3
Well here is how I got it:

M(theta)=L*R*Sin(theta)
dM/dL=RSin(theta)

dV=dU/dL=d(int(M^2/(2*E*I)*r*dTheta,Pi->0)/dP
=1/EI * int(M*dm*R*dTheta,Pi->0)

Substituing values for M(theta) and dM

PR^3/EI * int(sin^2(theta)dTheta,Pi->0)

dV=PR^3/2EI
 
  • #4
Hey robip, a few questions when you mean the load is radially wouldn't the load be horizontal (because of the geometry properties of a semi circle)?

Also would you care to post a diagram with the geometry of the problem?, I'm not seeing what are the variables on your work, besides the obvious L.
 
  • #6
Vertical Displacement case:

So for a thin curved-beam, taking as our ind. variable theta and L will be the force by Castigliano, then we have:

[tex] M(\theta) = (-R \sin \theta)(L) [/tex]

[tex] M(\theta) = (-R \sin \theta)(L) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\partial M}{\partial L} = (-R \sin \theta) [/tex]

Ok, then L = P,

[tex] M(\theta) = (-R \sin \theta)(P) [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\partial M}{\partial L} = (-R \sin \theta) [/tex]

and

[tex] \Delta = \int^{\theta}_{0} M (\frac{\partial M}{\partial L}) \frac{R d \theta}{EI} [/tex]

[tex] \Delta = \int^{\pi}_{0} ((-R \sin \theta)(P)) (-R \sin \theta}) \frac{R d \theta}{EI} [/tex]

[tex] \Delta_{free-end} = \frac{P \pi R^{3}}{2EI} [/tex]

Anyway, it looks like your work is accurate. This is what i got.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
robip said:
dV=PR^3/2EI

You forgot the pi in your answer.
 
  • #8
i can't believe i didn't notice all my values were out by about 3... :rofl:

so for the horizontal i would just use Cos instead right?
 
  • #9
robip said:
so for the horizontal i would just use Cos instead right?

More like [itex] R - R \cos \theta [/itex].
 
  • #10
oh yea, i see, thanks so much for the help!

really appreciated
 
  • #11
robip said:
oh yea, i see, thanks so much for the help!

really appreciated

No problem :biggrin: , and welcome to PF!.
 
  • #12
hmmm i just realized it is also asking for the axial load to be included in the equation, how would i calculate the axial load at any point with respect to angle theta?
 
  • #13
Use your geometry knowledge to decompose the axial component of the stresses in x and y, and then do sums of forces in y and x.

Remember the axial component is tangential to the circle, and the radius is perpendicular to tangents.
 
  • #14
hi robip,

I would be interested in seeing the rest of your workings and results for this particular problem as i am doing something similar atm.

Much appreciated

Cheers
 
  • #15
Hi robip,

Are you a student at curtin university of technology in Perth, Australia, by any chance? :)

.Ksum006
 
  • #16
OK, so for horizontal this is what i got:

(3*pi*P*R^3)/(2EI)

I did this using the same process as the vertical, but using M(theta)=(R-Rcos@)*P.

Is the above answer correct? I am not very good at calulus and this is where i may have come stuck:

dh=(PR/EI)*[Integration between Pi and 0 of (R-Rcos@)^2.d@]
 
  • #17
I have a similar question but with a 3/4 cantilever. The answers are on the attachment but can't get them using the formula supplied - Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • q2.JPG
    q2.JPG
    38.8 KB · Views: 2,101
  • #18
Cyclovenom said:
Use your geometry knowledge to decompose the axial component of the stresses in x and y, and then do sums of forces in y and x.

Remember the axial component is tangential to the circle, and the radius is perpendicular to tangents.

i seem to be doing the same question and i am able to do the first part of the vertical displacement, as stated above, but i can't get an equation for the axial load in terms of the applied load P. and having it as a function of theta.
 
  • #19
anybody can help me how to derive an equation of deflection of circular bar by using castigliano theorem ?...the final answer is like this:

δ_v=∂U/(∂P_v )=(P_v R^3)/EI (π/4-2/π) )
 
  • #20
I see there are many questions related to Castigliano's theorem with thin curved beams. I recommend reading this website http://school.mech.uwa.edu.au/~dwright/DANotes/MST/thin/thin.html#thin".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
I have the exact same problem as robip. "Calculate the equations for the horizontal and vertical deflections taking into account both bending moments and axial loads using castiglianos theorem".

I have read the website http://school.mech.uwa.edu.au/~dwrig...thin.html#thin. but I am still not 100% certain of my answer.

My attempt at the solution.
For vertical deflection due to axial load:
Paxial = Psin(theta)
dP(axial)/dP = sin(theta)

vertical deflection= (1/EA) * int( Paxial * dP(axial)/dP * R )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
= (1/EA) * int( Psin(theta)*sin(theta)*R )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
=(PR/EA) * int( (sin(theta))^2 )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
=(PR/EA) * (Pi/2)
=(P*PI*R/2EA)

For horizontal deflection due to axial load:
Paxial = Pcos(theta)
dP(axial)/dP = cos(theta)

horizontal deflection= (1/EA) * int( Paxial * dP(axial)/dP * R )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
= (1/EA) * int( Pcos(theta)*cos(theta)*R )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
=(PR/EA) * int( (cos(theta))^2 )d(theta) with limits 0->Pi
=(PR/EA) * (Pi/2)
=(P*PI*R/2EA)

I.e. Horizontal deflection and vertical deflection due to axial loading is exactly the same.

Verification of my solution would be very much appreciated.
 
  • #22
I am a little rusty as when I solved this problem I had just graduated with BS in Structural Engineering. However, I went to graduate school in economics (funny, eh?).

I remember Castigliano Theorem(s) fairly well, and from my solution of vertical displacement, I can tell your vertical displacement is wrong. Your lever arm is wrong! you forgot another R!, also your partial derivative inside the integral is wrong.

For the second part,

I believe you don't need to take into "account" the axial load. Take the reference point with respect to the edge of the section, and the apply Castigliano again by putting an horizontal fictious load. The lever arm should be the one I gave in a previous post [itex]R-R \cos \theta [/itex]. The reason is that when you cut a section, you aggregate the stresses into equivalent Force-Couple systems. In this case, you decompose the force into a radial (shear force), and a tangential (axial force), and you also have the couple (or moment). If you take moment with respect to the section, then the lines of action of both shear and axial gives radius vectors of length 0, and thus moments of 0 with respect to it. However, the couple still counts.

Good luck!
 
  • #23
I was able to get it in the end. Thankyou for your help!
 
  • #24
If i wanted to calculate I in this problem would it simply be as follows:

I = (pi*P*R^(3)) / (2E) ?

and thus substituting values in if we take
E = 69 GPa
R = 150 mm
P = 0.1 N

we get I = 1.28 *10^(-14)m^(4)

The answer i get in my textbook however reads - 1.63*10^(-28)m^4

Am i doing something wrong?

Thank you for your time.
 
  • #25
vertical deflection = (pi*P*R^3) / (2EI)

Therefore,
I=(pi*P*R^3) / (2E*vertical deflection)

Hope that helps
 
  • #26
Can you solve for I any other way - other than using that equation without vertical deflection and or horizontal deflection?
 
Last edited:
  • #27
I think you can use
I=bh^3/12 where b and h are the width and thickness of the beam respectively.
 
  • #28
Hi thanks for the reply,

is that (bh)^3/12 or b (h^3/12)
 
  • #29
b (h^3/12)
 
  • #30
How to find deflection in a circular ring subjected to tensile forces along the diameter?
Means, take a circular ring and pull it on the opposite sides...
 

1. What is Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams?

Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams is a mechanical engineering principle that allows for the calculation of the deflection of a curved beam under a given load. It is based on the principle of virtual work, where the deflection is determined by the partial derivative of the strain energy with respect to the applied load.

2. What is the significance of Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams?

Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams is significant because it provides a method for determining the deflection of curved beams, which are commonly used in structural engineering. It allows engineers to accurately predict the behavior of curved beams under different loads, which is essential for designing safe and efficient structures.

3. How is Castigliano's Theorem applied in real-world engineering problems?

Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams is commonly used in the design and analysis of structures such as bridges, arches, and domes. It is also used in the design of machine components, such as gears and shafts, that experience bending or torsional loads. Additionally, it is used in the field of biomechanics to study the behavior of bones and joints under different loads.

4. What are the assumptions made in Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams?

The main assumptions made in Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams are that the material is linearly elastic, the beam is initially straight, and the deflection is small compared to the beam's length. It also assumes that the beam is subjected to static loading and that the material properties are constant throughout the beam.

5. Are there any limitations to Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams?

Yes, there are some limitations to Castigliano's Theorem on Curved Beams. It is not applicable to beams with non-uniform cross-sections or those that experience large deflections. It also does not take into account the effects of shear deformation and stress concentration at the beam's supports. Therefore, it should be used with caution and in conjunction with other methods for more accurate results.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
335
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
573
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top