Cauchy -schwarz inequality help

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dr hannibal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Inequality
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
dr hannibal
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Need help proving Cauchy Schwarz inequality ...

the first method I know is pretty easy

[itex]\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^n (a_ix-b_i)^2 \geq 0[/itex]

expanding this and using the discriminatant quickly establishes the inequality..The 2nd method I know is I think a easier one , but I don't have a clue about how this notation works..

Since cauchy SHwarz inquality states..

[tex](a_1b_1+a_2b_2+...+a_nb_n)^2 \leq ((a_1)^2+(a_2)^2+..+(a_n)^2)((b_1)^2+(b_2)^2+...+(b_n)^2)[/tex]

[tex]((a_1)^2+(a_2)^2+..+(a_n)^2)((b_1)^2+(b_2)^2+...+(b_n)^2)-(a_1b_1+a_2b_2+...+a_nb_n)^2 \geq 0[/tex]

I don't usnderstand how the below notation works as I can't follow from the above line to the line below , if someone can point me to some resources where I can know more about it :) ...[itex]\displaystyle\sum_{i\not=j}^n ((a_i)^2(b_j)^2+(a_j)^2(b_i)^2-2a_ib_ja_jb_i )[/itex]Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's just summing over the quantities within the parentheses for which the two indices i and j differ. Note that if i = j, the quantity inside the summation is just 0, so it does not contribute to the sum.
 
snipez90 said:
That's just summing over the quantities within the parentheses for which the two indices i and j differ. Note that if i = j, the quantity inside the summation is just 0, so it does not contribute to the sum.

thanks :) , one more small question when they have summed the above where is [tex]-2a_ib_ja_jb_i[/tex] coming from?
 
[tex](a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + \ldots + a_nb_n)^2[/tex]​

Expanded out, convince yourself that whenever i ≠ j you get a 2aibiajbj. To do this, it helps to write out a simple case for small n (n = 2 or 3) and look at how what terms you get that involve i ≠ j. The sign in your example is negative, because you are subtracting.
 
Tedjn said:
[tex](a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + \ldots + a_nb_n)^2[/tex]​

Expanded out, convince yourself that whenever i ≠ j you get a 2aibiajbj. To do this, it helps to write out a simple case for small n (n = 2 or 3) and look at how what terms you get that involve i ≠ j. The sign in your example is negative, because you are subtracting.

thanks