CDF of a variable with a negative exponent in its PDF

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the cumulative distribution function (CDF) derived from a given probability density function (PDF) with a negative exponent. Initially, the CDF was incorrectly calculated, resulting in negative values and a discontinuity at x=2. The poster realized that the negative sign in the CDF was due to a misunderstanding of the integration process for calculating the CDF. After correcting the integration method, the CDF became a proper increasing function that starts at 0 and ends at 1. This resolution highlights the importance of accurate integration techniques in deriving CDFs from PDFs.
jimbobian
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Ok, this one's got me stumped!

Let's take as an example the probability density function for a random variable X so that:

f(x) = \frac{4}{3x^{3}} 1≤x<2
f(x) = \frac{x}{12} 2≤x≤4
f(x) = 0

So the CDF for this variable comes out as:

F(x) = \frac{-2}{3x^{2}} 1≤x<2
F(x) = \frac{x^{2}}{24} 2≤x≤4

So how can the CDF be negative for 1≤x<2, the CDF is P(X≤x), so to my mind that makes no sense. And secondly I have never seen a CDF with a discontinuity like in this one. At x=2, it jumps from -1/6 to 1/6

This made me think that I should ignore the negative sign in the CDF for 1≤x<2, but then for 1≤x<2 F(x) is a decreasing function, how can that make sense?

Someone enlighten me... please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I've figured out why the minus sign shouldn't have been there, I forgot that what you actually do to find the CDF is:

\int_{-∞}^{x} p(t)dt

Which sorts out the minus sign, other problem still remains?

EDIT: I'm talking rubbish this hasn't fixed a thing!

EDIT2: Turns out it fixed both problems. CDF is now a lovely increasing function that starts at 0 and ends at 1. Turns out I'd been doing an incorrect short cut on CDFs and never noticed because it has never not worked until tonight!
 
Last edited:
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K