Centre of Charge? - Does it Depend on Charge Type?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of the "center of charge" and its dependence on charge types. It highlights that the formula for the center of charge, analogous to the center of mass, can lead to undefined scenarios when total charge is zero. Instead, the dipole moment, defined as \(\vec{d} = \sum q_\alpha \vec{r}_\alpha\), is emphasized as a crucial quantity that provides insights into the electric field of neutral systems and plays a significant role in electromagnetic radiation. The relationship between charge distribution and dipole moments is also linked to phenomena such as Van der Waals' bonds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dipole moments in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with the concept of charge neutrality
  • Basic knowledge of multipole expansion
  • Introduction to Van der Waals' forces in solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of dipole moments in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of multipole expansion in electric fields
  • Research the role of oscillating dipoles in electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate the effects of charge distribution on molecular bonding, particularly in Van der Waals' interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, solid-state physics, and molecular interactions, will benefit from this discussion.

neutrino
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
2
Is there anything like centre of mass for charges? Does it depend upon what type of charges are involved?

Thanks,
Navneeth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might be tempted to define the "center of charge" as something like
<br /> \vec{R} = \frac{\sum q_\alpha \vec{r}_\alpha}{\sum q_\alpha}<br />
by analogy with the center of mass. The most obvious trouble with this formula is that the total charge, the thing in denominator, can be zero. This means the center of charge doesn't exist in general (at least using this definition). On the other hand, the quantity \vec{d} = \sum q_\alpha \vec{r}_\alpha is actually important and it is given a name: the dipole moment. Perhaps you have heard of dipoles in your electromagnetism courses, if so you might try to convince yourself that the general expression I gave is equivalent to what you know. The dipole moment can tell you a lot of important things about a system. For example, when a system is charge neutral, the dipole moment (if it isn't zero) determines the electric field of your system far away from the system (this is called the multipole expansion) . Also, oscillating dipoles are very important when studying electromagnetic radiation.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I have come across dipoles in intro courses, but I came up with this question after going through a qualitative explanation of Van der Waals' bonds, where the symmetry of charge distribution of an atom is supposed to be 'disturbed' prior to the formation of a bond. In a book on Solid-State Physics I have (not one of those which can be recognised by the author's name alone), it is mentioned that "...due to the disturbance of the electron cloud of an atom, the centres of the positive and negative charge distributions no more coincide and an elctric dipole with a non-zero dipole moment is generated...".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
536
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K