Centre of Mass/Tipping Point Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter RateOfReturn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a potential transcription error in a problem involving the center of mass and tipping point of a double-decker bus. The original question was misinterpreted as 280 degrees instead of the correct 28 degrees from the vertical. This misunderstanding led to incorrect calculations, as the angle affects the relevant formula used. After recalculating with the correct angle, the answer aligns with the book's solution of 2.3m. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate transcription in mathematical problems.
RateOfReturn
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The top deck of a bus is loaded with sandbags. The bus is tested to ensure all 4 wheels are in contact with the ground up, to at least 280 degrees to the vertical. The height of the bus is 4.4m and width is 2.4m. Calculate the height of the centre of mass of the loaded bus by assuming it would topple over at larger angles.
Relevant Equations
h = 1.2tan(10)
1653996533504.png

I drew out a small diagram to illustrate my attempt. I interpreted 280 degrees from the vertical as 10 degrees from the horizontal. Using trig I solved for the h, which I get an obviously incorrect answer. The actual answer in the book is 2.3m,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest it means the bus base is tilted 10° to the horizontal.
 
I believe that you have misread the question or that it has been poorly transcribed. It is not 280 degrees. It is 28 degrees (28°)

One can easily imagine a transcription error where a degree symbol is rendered as the digit zero.
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-double-decker-buses-not-tip-over said:
In the UK, British transportation regulations required that double decker buses be tested on a tilting ramp, to an angle of 28-degrees.
Note that this is 28 degrees from the vertical, not 10 degrees from the horizontal. So the relevant formula will change slightly from the one you have used.

With those tweaks in mind, I get the book answer to two significant digits.

Edit to add graphical image
https://www.ltmuseum.co.uk/collections/collections-online/photographs/item/2002-18969 said:
1654008667895.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics, haruspex, Delta2 and 2 others
jbriggs444 said:
I believe that you have misread the question or that it has been poorly transcribed. It is not 280 degrees. It is 28 degrees (28°)

One can easily imagine a transcription error where a degree symbol is rendered as the digit zero.

Note that this is 28 degrees from the vertical, not 10 degrees from the horizontal. So the relevant formula will change slightly from the one you have used.

With those tweaks in mind, I get the book answer to two significant digits.
Thank you, after re-calculating I get 2.256..., which is consistent with the answer to 2.s.f. It unfortunately appears to be a printing error.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jbriggs444
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top