Centripetal Acceleration must equal Gravity in a Space Station

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time required for a rocket motor to fire in order to achieve artificial gravity in a rotating space station designed as a large wheel. The context is centered around the concepts of centripetal acceleration and angular motion, with specific parameters provided for the space station's radius and mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of fundamental equations such as F=ma and the relationship between tangential and angular acceleration. There is mention of incorporating moment of inertia and torque to find the radial acceleration. Questions arise regarding the role of angular momentum and how to effectively use the given parameters to solve for time.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, including the application of torque and moment of inertia. There is a recognition that the correct angular velocity must be reached to achieve the desired centripetal acceleration. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific equations and assumptions about the space station's shape.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the problem may involve complexities related to moment of inertia and angular momentum, which have not been fully resolved in the discussion. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the role of potential energy and initial kinetic energy in this context.

jamesbiomed
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A space station is to provide artificial gravity to support long-term stay of astronauts and cosmonauts. It is designed as a large wheel, with all the compartments in the rim, which is to rotate at a speed that will provide an acceleration similar to that of terrestrial gravity for the astronauts (their feet will be on the inside of the outer wall of the space station and their heads will be pointing toward the hub). After the space station is assembled in orbit, its rotation will be started by the firing of a rocket motor fixed to the outer rim, which fires tangentially to the rim. The radius of the space station is
R = 44 m, and the mass is M = 2.5 10^5 kg. If the thrust of the rocket motor is F = 1.5 10^2 N, how long should the motor fire?

Homework Equations



F=ma
tangential acceleration= radius*angular acceleration
w=w0+at
w=v/t
angular acceleration=w/t => w= angular acceleration* time
gravity= 9.81
I (wheel)=1/2 m (r1^2-r2^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Used F=ma, divided (f=150 N) by ( M=250000)= tangential acceleration (6 * 10^-4)
To get angular acceleration multiplied tangential acceleration times the radius. Got .0264
Since I'm looking for the time to make the centripetal acceleration equal to 9.81, I used
ac=w^2r. I already know w=angular accel *time, and that gave me ac=(α^2)(t^2)R
Then I solved for t and got 19.2 seconds.

The correct answer is 34600 s

Can someone check my work? It's also likely that moment of inertia is involved here, but since there is no potential energy (we're in space) and no initial kinetic energy, I couldn't think of a way to work it in. Angular momentum seems possible but I can't see how. Any help would be great! thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to use torque in order to find the radial acceleration, which is where you would incorporate moment of inertia.
 
Ok, I'll try that and see if it helps. Thanks
 
A net torque (rocket firing) applied over a period of time causes a change in angular momentum.


And you know the angular velocity you must reach to achieve an centripetal acceleration of 9.8
V^2/r = ( ω*r)^2/r = 9.8



I think this might be the quickest route.

And you are definitely going to use I in the above. Your are trying to rotate an object with a large moment of inertia... Also since they only gave you one radius that I see, pretend the space station is a thin hoop. So that's I = Mr^2

see what you get...
 
pgardn, that worked perfectly. Thanks for the explanation as well, it made sense.

Many thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K