Centripetal force Rotor-ride problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a "Rotor-ride" at a carnival, where riders are pressed against the inside wall of a vertical cylinder with a radius of 2.0 meters, rotating at a speed of 1.1 revolutions per second. The question focuses on determining the minimum coefficient of friction required to prevent a person from slipping down when the floor drops out.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between friction and gravitational forces, with some questioning the correctness of the initial equations used. There is a focus on understanding how the normal force relates to the centripetal force in this scenario.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants providing insights into the forces at play. Some have offered corrections to the initial reasoning, while others are still clarifying their understanding of the relationships between the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the radius of 2.0 meters seems small compared to other rides they have seen, and there is a discussion about the implications of the rotational speed on the forces acting on the riders.

Gauss177
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a "Rotor-ride" at a carnival, riders are pressed against the inside wall of a vertical cylinder 2.0m in radius rotating at a speed of 1.1 revolutions per second when the floor drops out. What minimum coefficient of friction is needed so a person won't slip down? Is this safe?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I set friction equal to the net force and then solved for mu, which I'm not sure is right or not:

umg = m(v^2/r)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure about the 2.0m? That seems awfully small compared to the ones I have seen.

In any case, your equation is not correct. The centripetal force is provided by the wall pushing the people inward, not by frcition. The friction keeps them from sliding down the wall.
 
Yeah the book says 2.0 meters.

For the person to not slide down the wall, the force of friction must equal the force of gravity, right? So do I just do:

F_fr = F_g
umg = mg

But then mg cancels out and u = 1? That doesn't seem right.
 
Gauss177 said:
Yeah the book says 2.0 meters.

For the person to not slide down the wall, the force of friction must equal the force of gravity, right? So do I just do:

F_{fr} = F_g
umg = mg

But then mg cancels out and u = 1? That doesn't seem right.

It is not right. The frictional force has no connection to mg in this problem except that it has to be equal to mg to hold the people in place. Your first equation is good. Your second one is not.

Although mg often appears in friction calculations, it is not the force in F_f = μ____. What belongs in the space?
 
Last edited:
I have no idea. :/ I thought friction was just u*normal? But then where does the 1.1 revolutions per second come from? Thanks for the help
 
Ok I figured out how to do this problem

F_f = F_g
mg = uF_n
mg = m(v^2/r)*u
u = .103

thanks olderdan
 
Gauss177 said:
I have no idea. :/ I thought friction was just u*normal? But then where does the 1.1 revolutions per second come from? Thanks for the help

But you do have an idea :smile: It is the normal force and as you have now realized, the normal force in this problem is not equal to mg.

Gauss177 said:
Ok I figured out how to do this problem

F_f = F_g
mg = uF_n
mg = m(v^2/r)*u
u = .103

thanks olderdan

That's it. For anyone else who might be looking here, the normal force in this problem is from the wall pressing in on the people to keep them in circular motion. It is the centripetal force

F_n = m(v^2/r)

which can be seen from the equations in the quote.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K