Centripetal force + uncertainty

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating centripetal force using the formula F = (mv²) / r, with specific values for mass, velocity, and radius. The mass is 2.8 ± 0.1 kg, velocity is 14 ± 2 m/s, and radius is 8.0 ± 0.2 m. The correct calculation for force yields F = 69 ± 14 N after considering the uncertainties in each variable, particularly noting that the uncertainty in velocity must be doubled due to squaring. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of calculating percentage uncertainties for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its formula F = (mv²) / r
  • Basic knowledge of uncertainty propagation in measurements
  • Ability to calculate percentage uncertainties for variables
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about uncertainty propagation techniques in physics
  • Study the concept of percentage uncertainty and its application
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, including centripetal acceleration
  • Review examples of force calculations with varying degrees of uncertainty
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those tackling problems involving centripetal force and uncertainty, as well as educators looking for examples of uncertainty propagation in calculations.

Wa1337
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The centripetal force is given by F= (mv2) / r. If the mass is measured to be 2.8 +/- 0.1 kg, the velocity is 14 +/- 2 ms^-1, and the radius 8.0 +/- 0.2 m, find the force on the mass, including the uncertainty.


Homework Equations


F= (mv2) / r


The Attempt at a Solution


0.1/2.8 = .04
2/14 = .14
.2/8.0 = .025

add all up and i got .205

I did the equation and got 69 (2 sig figs) and finally got F = 69 +/- .21

Is that the proper uncertainty answer? If not please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edit: nvm

final answer then: F = 270 +/- .21 ? (2 sig figs both)
 
Last edited:
Wa1337 said:
edit: nvm

final answer then: F = 270 +/- .21 ? (2 sig figs both)

I did not say the force was wrong but you changed it; moreover, you still don't have the uncertainty right as I understand it.

I guess I'm not helping.
 
I'm sorry I kind of don't get it cause I'm really new to this stuff but my final answer without changing the force is:

F = 69 +/- 14

is that better? thanks
 
Wa1337 said:
I'm sorry I kind of don't get it cause I'm really new to this stuff but my final answer without changing the force is:

F = 69 +/- 14

is that better? thanks

You were closer in your original post.
 
Wa1337 said:

Homework Statement



The Attempt at a Solution


0.1/2.8 = .04
2/14 = .14
.2/8.0 = .025

add all up and i got .205

I did the equation and got 69 (2 sig figs) and finally got F = 69 +/- .21

Is that the proper uncertainty answer? If not please help.

Why is no one helping with this? I'm about to give him the answer as I think it is--it's really not something I do day-to-day but IAW to site I posted previously.

We are surpassing Winston Chruchill adage here "The Americans and the British are a single people divided only by a common language."
 
Well he has to get the percentage uncertainties for each of the values.

So for example, for velocity it would 2/14*100 = 14.28% (quite a large uncertainty there)

Since it's squared, the uncertainty would be double: 28.57%

Do this for each of the variables, and add up the percentages. Then your final percentage of the calculated value for force should be your uncertainty in Newtons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
916
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K