Cephalopods can't tolerate fresh water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norbert Fnord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cephalopods, including octopuses and squids, are unable to tolerate fresh water, a characteristic that has persisted throughout their evolutionary history. This inability may explain why cephalopods have not evolved into land-dwelling forms. The discussion highlights the significance of freshwater tolerance in the evolutionary transition to terrestrial life, referencing the tiktaalik as a likely freshwater ancestor of land vertebrates. The need for extensive citations and literature, such as the journal Lethaia, is emphasized for further exploration of this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cephalopod biology and ecology
  • Familiarity with evolutionary theory and adaptation
  • Knowledge of the fossil record, particularly regarding vertebrate evolution
  • Access to scientific literature and journals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the evolutionary adaptations of cephalopods in marine environments
  • Study the role of freshwater tolerance in the evolution of terrestrial vertebrates
  • Examine the fossil evidence of tiktaalik and its ecological context
  • Explore the journal Lethaia for articles on invertebrate trace fossils and adaptations
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, paleontologists, evolutionary ecologists, and anyone interested in the evolutionary history of cephalopods and their ecological adaptations.

Norbert Fnord
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Cephalopods (octopuses, squids, nautilus, etc.) are among the most complex invertebrates. They have been around since before the dinosaurs. Yet, there are none that tolerate fresh water today - perhaps there never have been (I am aware there is one squid in Chesapeake that lives in brackish water). This leads me to wonder about a few things:
  1. What is it about this class of molluscs that prevents them from exploiting fresh water environments?
  2. Is this why they also have not given rise to any land forms?
  3. Is tolerance of fresh water essential to evolution to living on the land?
  4. Were the predecessors (e.g. tiktaalik) of the first land vertebrates, fresh water animals?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
None are known, that is correct.

Here is a somewhat "layman's version" of why:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/01/16/3670198.htm
Is this why they also have not given rise to any land forms?
No, any larger animals with no kind of skeletal system would have trouble moving, as an example

Is tolerance of fresh water essential to evolution to living on the land?
Were the predecessors (e.g. tiktaalik) of the first land vertebrates, fresh water animals?

The tiktaalik probably was freshwater -
Narkiewicz, Katarzyna; Narkiewicz, Marek (January 2015). "Middle Devonian invertebrate trace fossils from the marginal marine carbonates of the Zachełmie tetrapod tracksite, Holy Cross Mountains, Poland". Lethaia 48 (1): 10–12. doi:10.1111/let.12083.

They likely had primitive lungs.

Please note your questions are good, very good. But they require a multitude of citations. Or a book. There are journals like Lethaia that often have good articles about fossil environments and how animals adapted to new environments.

Try a University library for:
'The Colonisation of Land: Origins and Adaptations of Terrestrial Animals' by Colin Little
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Norbert Fnord
Thank you - for all of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K