Chain sliding off a table, find the function a(t)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a chain lying on a frictionless table, half off the edge, which begins to accelerate due to gravity when released. The goal is to determine the acceleration of the chain as a function of time, given its mass, the acceleration due to gravity, and its length.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using Newton's second law and energy conservation to derive equations relating acceleration, velocity, and position. There are attempts to express acceleration as a function of the length of the chain hanging off the table and to integrate various equations to find relationships between variables.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to derive the acceleration function, with some suggesting the use of differential equations and energy principles. There is recognition of the complexity involved in integrating the equations and the need to express time as a function of position, with no clear consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of incorporating time into their equations and the implications of the piecewise nature of the acceleration as the chain falls. The discussion includes questioning the assumptions made about the system and the definitions of variables used in the equations.

packers7
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A chain lies on a frictionless table at rest, half off the edge, and half on. As soon as it is let go, it begins accelerating due to gravity only. Determine the acceleration of the chain as a function of time. The mass is m, gravity is g, and the length of the chain is L.

Homework Equations


F=ma
K=(1/2)mvv
Ug=mgh
W=integral(F*dr)
a=dv/dt , v=dd/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


Let x=the length of chain hanging vertically. Therefore x starts at L/2, and ends at L, the min and max accelerations are g/2 and g.
I figured out that a=x/L*g
I then tried to use energy, with my zero line level with the table, so I was dealing with negative values. I would get mgL/8 =-xxm/(2L)+mvv/2. Solving for v gives a messy square root, and I don't see how time fits into the equation.

I know that the function will be piecewise because once the acceleration reaches g, it will remain there. I just need to find the function as it grows from g/2 to g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

packers7 said:
I figured out that a=x/L*g

Hi packers7! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Hint: x/L*g = a = dv/dt = dv/dx times … ? :smile:
 
oops, my energy equation is wrong, the first term, to the left of the = should be negative. And the first term to the right of the = should also have *g.

dv/dt=dv/dx*dx/dt
So a=dv/dx*dx/dt.
Taking the differential of my energy equation, simplified, yields dv/dx=x/(L*v). Should I substitute v with the energy equation, solved for v (sqrt of stuff)?
I tried using a=dv/dx*dx/dt. Which goes to x*g/L=x/(L*v)*dx/dt. That leads to dx/dt=v*g
Am I on the right track?
 
packers7 said:
I tried using a=dv/dx*dx/dt. Which goes to x*g/L=x/(L*v)*dx/dt. That leads to dx/dt=v*g

What happened to dv? :confused:

Start again:

you can do it two ways …

i] use Newton's second law F = ma and a = dv/dx to get a differential equation for v and x

ii] just use KE + PE = constant, to get an ordinary equation for v and x.

They come to the same thing in the end, but try both of them, just for practice. :smile:
 
sorry, I don't think I'm making any progress. I can't figure out when t comes into the answer.

I tried using F=m*dv/dx
m*a=m*dv/dx
a=dv/dx
x*g/L*dx=dv
integrate
x*x*g/(2*L)+C=v
C=-L*g/8
I can't use v=distance/time since that's avg velocity.

With energy, I tried
K+Ug=constant
.5*m*v*v+(x/L)*m*g*(-x/2)=-m/2*g*(-L/4)
.5*v*v-x*x*g/(2*L)=-g*L/8
Do I differentiate here?
v*dv-x*g/L*dx=0
v*dv=x*g/L*dx
dv/dx=x*g/(L*v)
I feel like I'm at a dead end :rolleyes:

doesn't a=dv/dt, not dv/dx? x is not time, I made it a length that changes
 
Last edited:
packers7 said:
I tried using F=m*dv/dx
m*a=m*dv/dx
a=dv/dx
x*g/L*dx=dv

That's right, except a isn't dv/dx, is it?

With energy, I tried
K+Ug=constant
.5*m*v*v+(x/L)*m*g*(-x/2)=-m/2*g*(-L/4)
.5*v*v-x*x*g/(2*L)=-g*L/8
Do I differentiate here?

No! v = dx/dt … so you integrate! :smile:
 
then I'd get: .5[(dx/dt)^2]=x*x*g/(2*L)-g*L/8
(dx/dt)^2=x*x*g/L-g*L/4
(dx/dt)^2=(4*x*x*g-g*L*L)/(4*L)
move x so it's with dx
[(dx)^2]/(4*x*x*g-g*L*L)=4*L*[(dt)^2]
integrate
(dx)(-[tanh^-1[2*x/L]]/(2*g*L)=(dt)4*L*t
integrate again
-(x*[tanh^-1[2*x/L]]+(L/4)ln(L*L-4*x*x))/(2*g*L)=L*t*t/2
?
this seems like it's too complicated to be right...
 
(have a square-root: √ and a squared: ² smile:)

Why are you integrating twice?

And where did tanh-1 come from? :confused:

v = dx/dt = a√(x² - b²) …
 
So if I take the square root of (dx/dt)^2=(4*x*x*g-g*L*L)/(4*L)
I get dx/dt=√[(4x²g-gL²)/(4L)]
dx*√[4L/(4x²g-gL²)]=dt , integrate
ln(2gx+g√[4x²-L²])/√[g] + C = t
test x=L/2, t=0 yields C=-ln(gL)/√[g]
solve for x
x=L(1+e^(2t√[g]))/(4*e^(t√[g]))
plug into a=xg/L
a=g/(4*e^(t√[g]))+g*e^(t√[g])/4
is that correct? i tested t=0, and a=g/2, which is right!
a=g/2*cosh(t√[g])
therefore at t=ln(2+√[3])/√[g], a=g ?
 
  • #10
Hi packers7! :smile:
packers7 said:
So if I take the square root of (dx/dt)^2=(4*x*x*g-g*L*L)/(4*L)
I get dx/dt=√[(4x²g-gL²)/(4L)]
dx*√[4L/(4x²g-gL²)]=dt , integrate
ln(2gx+g√[4x²-L²])/√[g] + C = t

No … where do you get ln from? :confused:

Hint: to make the integration easier, rewrite it as

(√(L/g))dx/√(x² - L²/4) = dt :smile:
 
  • #11
I'm plugging in the equation into http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp
using what you have, Sqrt[L/g]*Sqrt[1/(x*x-L*L/4)]
integrates into √[L/g]*ln(2x+√[4x²-L²]) (+C)
i checked by taking the derivative of that, and it works.
am I making a mathematical mistake?
 
  • #12
packers7 said:
I'm plugging in the equation into http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp
using what you have, Sqrt[L/g]*Sqrt[1/(x*x-L*L/4)]
integrates into √[L/g]*ln(2x+√[4x²-L²]) (+C)
i checked by taking the derivative of that, and it works.
am I making a mathematical mistake?

ok … bizarrely, that is right :rolleyes:

but that gives you t as a function of x, while the question asks for x as a function of t …

how are you going to "invert" something so complicated? :cry:

Hint: to solve dx/√(x² - b²) the easy way, make a substitution! :smile:
 
  • #13
my logic is that if i solve that integrated equation for x, then i can plug that in for a=xg/L, getting an equation that gives acceleration as a function of time
is that what you're trying to tell me to do? x gives the amount of chain hanging vertically, not the acceleration.
 
  • #14
packers7 said:
my logic is that if i solve that integrated equation for x, then i can plug that in for a=xg/L, getting an equation that gives acceleration as a function of time …

ok … show me!
 
  • #15
i've already done it in an earlier post...

√[L/g]*ln(2x+√[4x²-L²]) (+C)=t
C=-√[L/g]*ln(L) (by using x=L/2 and t=0)
then solving for x yields x=(L²+L²*e^(2t√[g/L]))/(4L*e^(t√[g/L])
x=L*(1+e^(2t√[g/L]))/(4e^(t√[g/L])), which equals (L/2)*cosh(t√[g/L])

a=xg/L
substitute x=(L/2)*cosh(t√[g/L])
a=(g/2)*cosh(t√[g/L])

(at t=0, a=g/2 and if a=g, t=√[L/g]*ln(2+√[3]))
:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
114
Views
16K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K