Challenge 25: Finite Abelian Groups

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The smallest positive integer n such that there are exactly 3 nonisomorphic Abelian groups of order n is 8. This conclusion is derived from the requirement that n cannot be square-free, necessitating factors that are multiples of each other. The analysis identifies that the first two integers with this property are 4, which yields 2 nonisomorphic groups, and 8, which yields 3 nonisomorphic groups: "8", "4x2", and "2x2x2". Thus, 8 is confirmed as the correct answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Abelian group theory
  • Knowledge of group isomorphism
  • Familiarity with the classification of finite groups
  • Basic number theory concepts related to divisibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the classification theorem for finite Abelian groups
  • Explore the properties of group orders and their implications
  • Learn about the structure of nonisomorphic groups
  • Investigate examples of finite groups and their classifications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties and classifications of finite groups will benefit from this discussion.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,861
What is the smallest positive integer n such that there are exactly 3 nonisomorphic Abelian group of order n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:
Its 8!
Show your work! :)
 
Last edited:
Greg Bernhardt said:
Show you're work! :)
I thought its legitimate to use our searching skills!:D
 
n cannot be square-free (it needs factors that are multiples of each other), otherwise you don't get multiple non-isomorphic groups. The first two numbers with that property are 4 (leading to 2 different groups, corresponding to "4" and "2x2") and 8 ("8", "4x2", "2x2x2"). Therefore, 8 is the smallest n.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joffan, ShayanJ, DarthMatter and 1 other person
Shyan said:
Its 8!

I thought its legitimate to use our searching skills
Oh come on! :H:nb):oldeek: If that's not a big spoiler, I don't know what is.:oldeyes:
 
Haha, I misread the challenge as asking for 3 non-Abelian groups, so - also using searching skills - I came to a different answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
690
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K